News

Councils urge No vote on the high-speed rail

Just vote no. That's the message from Menlo Park and Atherton city council members regarding Proposition 1A, the high-speed rail bond measure on the Nov. 4 ballot.

In separate meetings, the councils passed resolutions opposed to the $9.95 billion bond measure, which would provide the first stage of funding to build a high-speed passenger train to connect San Francisco and Los Angeles.

Under the current plan, high-speed trains would use the Caltrain corridor to shoot up and down the Peninsula — a route both councils strongly oppose due to potential impacts on homes and businesses located near the train tracks.

The Atherton council voted 4-0 to oppose Proposition 1A, following a Sept. 24 high-speed rail study session.

The Menlo Park council voted 3-1, with John Boyle opposed, at its Sept. 23 meeting, to oppose the bond measure.

The mayors of both towns — Jim Janz of Atherton and Andy Cohen of Menlo Park — did not vote because they live within 500 feet of the Caltrain tracks.

"I oppose [Proposition 1A because of the impacts to Menlo Park," said Menlo Park Councilman Richard Cline. He noted the potential construction, aesthetic, and property-value impacts of running the estimated $45 billion train through the Caltrain corridor. That helped make his opposition the "easiest decision" he's made as a council member, he said.

"I suspect that high-speed rail, as presently planned ... has a very high probability of being a financial disaster," said Atherton Councilman Jim Dobbie. He questioned the budget and ridership projections of the high-speed rail system — concerns echoed by several residents at the Sept. 24 study session. "I can see no reason why I would ever consider voting for the high-speed rail project," Mr. Dobbie said.

But Menlo Park Councilman John Boyle, the lone councilman in the two cities not opposed to the bond measure, said the opposition to the project is "shortsighted."

"I think we're missing the big picture," Mr. Boyle said, pointing to the potential environmental benefits and congestion relief that high-speed rail could provide statewide. He noted that Menlo Park, Atherton and other cities along the proposed route would have a chance to weigh in on the specifics of the plan if and when the bond measure passes.

Comments

Posted by Joanna, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Oct 1, 2008 at 8:46 pm

Voting against this is shortsighted indeed. If we never approved projects because they would impact us because of construction or aesthetics then 101 and 280 would never have been built.

Another reason to defeat Fergusson this November. Cline and Haywire, you're next.


Posted by truth, a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Oct 1, 2008 at 11:06 pm

Another Boyle parasite with the same ideological garbage. Boyle spends his free time rewriting HSR brochures and passing them off as editorials.


Posted by OldMan, a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Oct 2, 2008 at 1:58 pm

Our city council is wasting our time & money. We should embrace the train, and work to have it come through Menlo in a way that works best for us.

NIMBY attitudes prevented BART from circling the bay. NIMBY attitudes on the HSR may mess it up as well.

If you live near the train tracks, you live with train noise and dust. I live near 101, I put up with 101 noise and dust. Will you vote to close 101 so I don't have to put up with it?


Posted by truth, a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Oct 2, 2008 at 3:55 pm

I have yet to hear a single penny going out for this lawsuit. Wasting money? Try $10 billion dollars with failing financial institutions and a worsening economy. You gotta be kidding me.

Don't make this a train debate.

This is about getting HSR to provide details that matter to us. If 101 was to be expanded to twice its size and homes were in the way of that, I would hope our council would stand up and not sell out Menlo Park to regional interests the way Boyle has done.

You guys are a joke.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 3,159 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,408 views

Just say no
By Jessica T | 6 comments | 1,348 views

Getting High in Menlo Park
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 851 views

As They Head Back To School, Arm Them With This
By Erin Glanville | 4 comments | 330 views