News


Neighbors seek injunction to stop M-A lights

Momentum is building for night football coming to Menlo-Atherton High School, a change that would end a 59-year tradition of afternoon-only games at the school.

The light towers are in place and football season has arrived. The first game is set for 7 p.m. on Thursday, Oct. 7, at Coach Ben Parks Field.

If the judge handling a lawsuit by neighbors to stop the lights does not decide soon on an injunction the neighbors are seeking to protect their relatively quiet and dark evenings, night games will have become a fait accompli, noted Anna Shimko, a San Francisco-based attorney representing the neighbors.

In a conference on Sept. 13, San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Marie Weiner "certainly seemed to be leaning toward an injunction of one form or another," Ms. Shimko said in an interview.

Asked to comment, Tim Fox, an attorney from the County Counsel's office who is representing the Sequoia Union High School District, said he doesn't make a habit of guessing what judges are thinking.

Judge Weiner, he said, was asking informational questions such as what relief for the residents might look like. "It's a different question from 'How would I do it,'" he said.

The neighbors' lawsuit claims that the Sequoia district is in violation of state law that requires such projects to be reviewed for possible effects on the environment, including noise, traffic, light and safety impacts. The district is preparing such a study; the temporary lights are a stand-in so that night football, and evening soccer and lacrosse and athletic practices, can go ahead for the current school year.

An impact study should have been done for the temporary lights as well, Ms. Shimko contends. "They just put the cart before the horse and jumped the gun," she said.

Mr. Fox, on his own and unaware of Ms. Shimko's metaphor, summed up the district's actions with the temporary lights. "Sometimes," he said, "you have to put the cart before the horse as long as the cart goes back behind the horse at the end of the day."

The choices before the judge, Ms. Shimko said, are a temporary restraining order sometime within the next two weeks or a preliminary injunction that would stop use of the lights until after a hearing on the merits of the case, scheduled for Nov. 9.

By Nov. 9, all four of M-A's scheduled night games for this season will have been played. That fact -- the school's having lights while the case is on hold -- could tilt the judge toward a restraining order if she sees the neighbors being at an unfair disadvantage, Ms. Shimko said.

Not just football

School district board members on Sept. 1 voted to go ahead with the temporary lights and to claim the district's right to exempt itself from local zoning laws. Board members asserted that they have considered the neighbors' concerns, in part by restricting use of the lights.

For the four football games, the lights must be out by 10:30 p.m. They must be out by 8:30 p.m. for all other weeknight athletic events, including the six games of soccer and six of lacrosse allowed per season and all evening athletic practices. No one can use the lights on weekends. The public address system is available for football games only.

The evening activities also align with a 40-minute later start time for the first class at M-A, a change officials made, starting with this school year, in recognition of research showing that teens need more sleep than they typically get.

The change is laudable, Ms. Shimko said, but does not justify "nearly two and a half hours of (artificial) light" in November. "They have not justified the need for the late use of the lights at all," she added. "They absolutely can accommodate all school-related practices before it gets dark."

Football, soccer and lacrosse are concerns to the neighbors, but the athletic practices that can take place five evenings a week are a real thorn in that they could interrupt parents putting their kids to bed, Ms. Shimko said. Even though the public address system is out of bounds? "There is still ample noise on the field" and spillage of light, she said.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 15, 2010 at 12:09 pm

"but does not justify "nearly two and a half hours of (artificial) light" in November. "

which is about the natural light in August, with earlier sun set and time change

they just want to play or practice until 8pm

like they do in August or Septmeber, and no body complains about that

silly silly ppl


 +   Like this comment
Posted by football fan
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Sep 15, 2010 at 1:19 pm

The Menlo-Atherton schedule shows the game on September 17 as an away game.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by David Boyce
Almanac staff writer
on Sep 15, 2010 at 1:33 pm

David Boyce is a registered user.

Thanks very much, football fan.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by M-A parent
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Sep 15, 2010 at 2:05 pm

Dear complaining neighbors: when you bought your house next to a high school, did you not realize that there would be high school students there, along with their high school activities? M-A has been thoughtful in trying to minimize the impact of the lights on its neighbors. How about the neighbors being considerate about a slight change (that you would already face if you lived near many of the other area high schools) that will mean a lot to the students?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by lights are the least worry
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 2:32 pm

Wait until the game is over and the silent neighborhood is disturbed by sqeeling tires, and fireworks from opposing schools. The neighbors will be frightened by "those" people.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 2:44 pm

That's it! It's not us, it's them. And we sure don't want any of those people coming to OUR community.

"lights are the least worrry", the irony of all this is that I saw your child drag-racing down my street when college let out (it happens every break)...and it happened last Thanksgiving too. Let's scrap Thanksgiving, that should solve the problem.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 15, 2010 at 4:50 pm

1 - the students elect to stay up later in the evening
2 - the school therefore decides that it needs to starts classes later so that the students can sleep later in the morning
3 - the school therefore says that because of later class starting times that the students will need lights to have their athletic actvities at night
4 - the neighbors are therefore expected to be impacted simply because the students elected to stay up later in the evening

What is wrong with this picture?

What happens when the students next want classes to start at noon because they now want to stay up until midnight?

Tail wagging the dog??


 +   Like this comment
Posted by M-A alum
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Sep 15, 2010 at 5:01 pm

M-A parents argument that neighbors shouldn't be complaining because "they knew they were buying property next to a school is trite and worn. Until 1970 M-A never even had a home varsity game. Now athletic field use has expanded vastly. There's a new PA center, etc. These neighbors deserve the same consideration that M-a parent would expect for herself.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 15, 2010 at 5:23 pm

"What is wrong with this picture?"

your premise on #1 and #2 is what is wrong with your picture

your 1 is false, studies show

investigate the why of 2, again the studies show

besides, kids only want to practice until same time they practice in August September

they not change, just time and light change

how does 8pm in November hurt neighbor more than 8pm in September?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 15, 2010 at 5:32 pm

anonymous - please read the original article -"The evening activities also align with a 40-minute later start time for the first class at M-A, a change officials made, starting with this school year, in recognition of research showing that teens need more sleep than they typically get."

The forcing issue in the school's decision is the later class starting time - if this is not the case then why was this not a problem in 2009?

You are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to your facts.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 5:41 pm

Substantial research has demonstrated that later start times at school has a measurable and positive affect on student achievement, performance, and health. Documented in many ways, including by our very own SRI. These are a few: Web Link

But more important, the later bell schedule hasn't changed sports practice times. It simply filled an afterschool gap.

Otherwise, we're really dealing with the sun setting earlier, and the popularity of afterschool sports and activities in a community with a dearth of playing fields. Dog wagging tail, doing what good schools and communities with good schools do.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 15, 2010 at 5:50 pm

peter

"showing that teens need more sleep than they typically get."

is diff from YOUR

"the students ELECT to stay up later "

quit bashing kids using word ELECT they no diff than you were

or me

"You are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to your facts."

funny you too


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 15, 2010 at 5:55 pm

Reality Check states:"the later bell schedule hasn't changed sports practice times."

School officials state:"The evening activities also align with a 40-minute later start time for the first class at M-A, a change officials made, starting with this school year".

I put more credence on what the school officials state than on Reality Check's undocumented assertion.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REAITY CHECK
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 6:18 pm

This year, the first class starts 40minutes later.
Except for the students who attend an extra class (early).

The point is, that practice times start at the same time.
Because last year, those students went took the extra class, after school. While everyone else waited.

PC, my assertion of the facts is no less documented than yours! (Exclamation point added to prove this is truth.) BTW, which school officials are you quoting? Here's one: Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Annoyed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 6:18 pm

I am amazed at the never ending myopic views the Lindenwood Homeowner's Association Board seems to place front and center with all the residents of Atherton. Now it isn't just the Board but also the neighbors on Oak Grove who bought their homes for "economic" reasons next to an established high school. As there are pressures on the field usage from "newer" sports like lacrosse, these will lead to greater demand on the fields and the logical solution(s) which would include adding lights to the football field.

it is troubling that the regular bickering in town appears to stem from a select few in Lindenwood. These people seem to feel that they own Atherton and the rest of us should reprioritize everything in town to meet their needs (and more importantly their wants). If we added up the legal costs we all have borne over the last four years due to the Lindenwood influence, we would all be shocked.

It is time to move on and find some real issues to tackle in town like the town budget and how we will manage our town in the future.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 6:58 pm

What rules will all these sporting games be played by? Will they made up as the games are played?
No other of the several separate entities that exist with our town boarders-for instance HP Park, or Bear Gulch Water, would would ever act with such complete disregard for changes that might impact proximate neighbors. Can any one even imagine a senario where Holbrook Palmer would suddenly announce that the were going put up MA's lights (and the LOUD SPEAKERS), and expect not to need to consider the rights of Watkins or MP Felton Gabels neighbors, or long held covenants with the town, or Atherton's zoning ordinance?

The argument spun out with such aplomb here,-- that the home owners should have known what they were getting into when they purchased their property, makes me see red.
They all knew exactly what they were buying into AND THIS IS WHAT THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO WANT TO KEEP!!!
It is the school that is pushing for a "Game Changer" , not the neighbors.
Everyone wants to see the kids get their athletic opportunities.
But it won't matter in 10 years how healthy and robust they all are, if they are not provided some instruction in good sportsmanship, respect for you neighbors, or why playing by the rules of any game might matter.
This actually a wonderful opportunity for the school teach a lesson in good citizenship by getting the salaried bureaucracy to back off, let the kids write a nice letter to the neighbors asking a favor, and to give the property owners a chance to be generous in negotiating a little give and take.
This should not be portrayed as an example of "tie base going to the runner".
The bases are very much fully loaded, and the batter is not allowed on to an occupied base with out some give and take for mutual accommodation.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 7:01 pm

I think it's really stupid to be complaining about lights that are on for the same duration of natural light in the summer. What's your REAL problem with the lights?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 7:51 pm

It's no secret that schools have football fields, gymnasiums, traffic, teachers, students, and neighbors. You know, sometimes farms raise food, and sometimes they have manure. It's all in the package. Ed, honestly, do you think that M-A should ask he city and state to change the laws and regulations and ordinances, now and just because you are surprised that schools want to supprt sports, or the community that would like to attend? And only now, you have an objection?

The school district is acting within the bounds of the law. If they're not, the judge will decide. Please, don't you suggest the school act otherwise, just because you have an opinion. There are already laws, ordinances and regulations in place. And they were in place when you bought your Lindenwood house. Or did you or your realtor forget to think about that?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 8:40 pm

I live in the hills on the other side of town from MA
Almost 2 miles as the crow flies from Woodside High school.
Every time they have a on the lights I can see them from all the way over here and don't mind at all.
Every time the the Loud Speakers start going I notice but don't mind for myself.

But every single time I feel badly for the neighbors who live much closer and who are expected to be good sports about the events since it all started getting so amped up the last few seasons.
Am I making my point here? I don't have a stake in this, but I can promise you those loud speakers are way too much.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Supremes say "Let there be lights"
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 8:51 pm

Any of you lawyer wannabees need only read the State Supreme Court decision on West Valley College in Saratoga.
It was identical to the current situation, but the court said that lights on the playing field were "an outdoor classroom experience", so exempt from CEQA mitigation.
Get a grip neighbors, grab a pom pom and cheer on the Bears!
You got great sightlines from your reserved backfence seats!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 15, 2010 at 9:10 pm

"and to give the property owners a chance to be generous in negotiating a little give and take."

discuss in other thread with peter and pogo

neighbor do not show up at last school board meeting in paper

neighbor do not show up at council meetings

neighbor only action is call lawyer and lawsuit

what kind of neighbor is that? lawyer? not like to give and take

only take

funny


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 15, 2010 at 10:37 pm

Put a frog into water and slowly turn up the heat; it won't know when the water starts to boil. But put the frog into boiling water and it knows the temperature.

First it was the new performing arts center; now it's the lights; what's next?

Recognize that the impact to the area is not just to the Lindenwood residents.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Informed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 15, 2010 at 11:07 pm

Ms. Shimko states, "They absolutely can accommodate all school-related practices before it gets dark." REALLY? Soccer practices can't start before 3:30 PM now that school gets out at 3:15, and they last 2.5 hours. Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure it gets dark before 6:00 PM once Daylight Saving ends. Practices would be shortened at least an hour from late November to mid January. Seems to me that someone needs to do her homework and check out when the sun actually sets in the winter!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 7:15 am

"First it was the new performing arts center; now it's the lights; what's next?"

What's next? The community will enjoy performances in the arts center and families & fans will attend to sports events. Some day, Atherton or Menlo Park might even build a new park or two, just for all of us to enjoy!

Or was your suggestion the school and community should have stopped building anything after 1952 (when our homes were built)? I'm glad that didn't happen. Would you believe it...I never play tennis, but I do like living in a town that has tennis courts. Same for new gymnasiums and skate parks, because I know that my neighbors enjoy these things. And there are things I enjoy that they dont' use. Go figure.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 8:59 am

anonymous -

True. And I added that if neighbors couldn't be bothered to show up and voice their concerns at the SUHSD meeting, then their complaints fall hollow on me.

I'm generally sympathetic to families that live next to a high use area such as a high school. They can bear a greater "burden" (and spare me the lectures, I'm only using that word to make a point) than others, especially if that use intensifies as is the case here. I'm even more sympathetic when the controlling government entity is exempt from local regulations.

In this case, it appears that the district DID reach out to neighbors and that those neighbors did not speak at the recent SUHSD meeting. Both of those factors make me a bit less sympathetic... but that does not mean their interests can be ignored.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 16, 2010 at 9:08 am

My comment has to do with the where these objectional residents chose to live. If you are looking for a home that you plan to stay in, make sure you look at where it is located....I love noise and teenagers and activity so living next to a school or in its proximity would not be a deterrent to purchase that home. However, if I liked to have peace and tranquility, and enjoyed a park-like non urban setting, I would not choose to buy a home in an area near a high school or any school for that matter. Any school district has to adjust to changes in the school calendar, start times, lack of sports facilities to accomodate all sports, (male and female), the rise and fall of the number of students, and the need to expand or close facilities as needed. If you are sensitive to these fluctuations do NOT buy your home near a school. If you overlooked these issues and already live there, get thicker paned windows and air conditioning and perhaps look at selling to someone who would really enjoy that environment.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 9:23 am

So if you lived next to a little grocery store and it was replaced by WalMart, I guess you wouldn't complain. After all, you purchased a home next to a store.

Just making a point...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 9:33 am

If you buy a house next to commercial property, you might just get a WalMart next door (or BevMo!). Or ask to change zoning for the property next door.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Sep 16, 2010 at 9:45 am

To Pogo -- I'm all for progress but workable progress understanding that there are boundaries.

My point was that one can usually find justification and rationalization for improvement and growth. However, this may have other side effects. These should be considered and potentially incorporated.

Here's another for you -- Laurel School is in the process of doing upgrades. In being a good neighbor what have they done to address the traffic impact on Ringwood Ave. when all the parents wait or park to pick up their kids? This causes significant delays almost every school day.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 16, 2010 at 10:01 am

Since the Town of Atherton has virtually no control over what M-A does I suggest that the Town de-annex the school property and let the school district provide all of its own services.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 16, 2010 at 10:13 am

heh

that will make town look real good to folks

can not bother to talk to school or board or kids so you kick them out

goes back to - call lawyer first instead of say hello

funny

mp take over ma hs laurel encinal menlo school and college sacred heart all others?

a-town already anti kid now anti family and education

funny


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 10:32 am

HRS and PGE are both public services like schools. Are people allowed to be concerned about how they might be personally effected by the impact of proximate changes? Or is this really none of their concern?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 11:05 am

Bob, please meet Ed.

This thread, like most, is testament that anyone can justify anything. Politicians can justify things - wars, insurance reform, taxes, high speed rail, school lights, whatever - better than most of us.

But you both make the same excellent point - please involve neighbors, early and often. No, it will never make everyone happy, but it definitely helps and it at least lets us vent!

I just wonder why politicians keep ignoring their constituents?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Sep 16, 2010 at 11:35 am

POGO -- excellent last sentence "I just wonder why politicians keep ignoring their constituents?" and true for all levels of government.

Everybody says we need to be better at communication, and yet it keeps getting repeated over and over which must mean we don't learn from the past. Communication is both listening and talking.

Ed also asks a good question regarding companies in the public space. There needs to be accountability, communication, and exchange. Many issues can be minimized if they are addressed early rather than having them become volcanoes.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 16, 2010 at 12:01 pm

"I just wonder why politicians keep ignoring their constituents?"

do they ignore?

neighbor do not go to board meet

call lawyer first

why blame politician for lazy neighbor who like lawsuit


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Observer
a resident of Woodside High School
on Sep 16, 2010 at 1:59 pm

> neighbor do not go to board meet

Cue the Vogon poetry and hold on tight to your Hitchhiker's towel.


"As you will no doubt be aware, the plans for development of the outlying regions of the Galaxy require the building of a hyperspatial express route through your star system, and regrettably your planet is one of those scheduled for demolition. The process will take slightly less that two of your Earth minutes. Thank you."

The PA died away.

Uncomprehending terror settled on the watching people of Earth. The terror moved slowly through the gathered crowds as if they were iron fillings on a sheet of board and a magnet was moving beneath them. Panic sprouted again, desperate fleeing panic, but there was nowhere to flee to.

Observing this, the Vogons turned on their PA again. It said:

"There's no point in acting all surprised about it. All the planning charts and demolition orders have been on display in your local planning department on Alpha Centauri for fifty of your Earth years, so you've had plenty of time to lodge any formal complaint and it's far too late to start making a fuss about it now."

The PA fell silent again and its echo drifted off across the land. The huge ships turned slowly in the sky with easy power. On the underside of each a hatchway opened, an empty black space.

By this time somebody somewhere must have manned a radio transmitter, located a wavelength and broadcasted a message back to the Vogon ships, to plead on behalf of the planet. Nobody ever heard what they said, they only heard the reply. The PA slammed back into life again. The voice was annoyed. It said:

"What do you mean you've never been to Alpha Centauri? For heaven's sake mankind, it's only four light years away you know. I'm sorry, but if you can't be bothered to take an interest in local affairs that's your own lookout.

"Energize the demolition beams."

Light poured out into the hatchways.

"I don't know," said the voice on the PA, "apathetic bloody planet, I've no sympathy at all."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by lights are the least worry
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 2:22 pm

Observer, why did you have to bring high speed rail into this?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 3:35 pm

He didn't, that was me.
And yes I do think there are parallel tracks here that connect both of these and many other issues.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ram Duriseti
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 16, 2010 at 4:02 pm

Mr. Carpenter,

The later start time for the students was/is predicated on a mountain of evidence suggesting that students learn better with a later start time than typically seen at most schools. Historically early school start times and release times are a relic of an agrarian society.

Here's a link summarizing the existing data:
Web Link

As for students staying up later, for my high-schooler, this has nothing to do with texting, IMing, surfing the web, cavorting. It is an artifact of the pile of homework that he has every night. This obnoxious homework trend is one that started around the time I was in high school and appears to have continued or gotten worse: quantity is used as a proxy for quality.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 16, 2010 at 5:55 pm

As for the rebuttle to POGO, no I wouldn't mind. I chose to live in an urban setting. I did not go up into the mountains nor did I go out in the country. I chose to be in a local community where the convenience of a grocery store would be a benefit to me...a WalMart is just a bigger store...still offers me benefits but more of them. I can walk to my grocery store, my WalMart, my school, my coffee shop, laundromat, the bus stop, the train...I do not use all of the services availed to me in my community but others do and it is a benefit for them. The world continues to move on, live and let live and life will be more enjoyable for all of us in it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of another community
on Sep 16, 2010 at 7:24 pm

Watch out, Menlo Park & Atherton residents - you're getting as picky, NIMBY & annoying as Palo Alto residents w/these complaints.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 8:26 pm

anonymous -

Thank you for your answer. I appreciate your intellectual honesty and philosophical consistency.

However, I suspect you are in a very small minority for two reasons. First, I would find it very hard to believe there are many other people in Menlo Park who would find living next to a grocery store as acceptable as living next to a WalMart. Not many people would agree with you that it's just part of living in an "urban setting." Similarly, living next to a school isn't the same as living next to a school with night football games, high intensity lighting and PA systems - unless you don't live next to that school, of course.

Second, we live in an area where our residents routinely protest cell phone towers, bike riders obeying local traffic laws and BevMo replacing Chili's. I would think having high intensity lighting, blaring PA systems and night football games going on right in your backyard - which represents a NEW use - would have a far greater impact on a family's quality of life than any of those things.

My point is that it's a bit too convenient to be in favor of the changes at M-A High School when they don't adversely impact you. But I do believe in karma so I'm sure eventually some project will impact those supporters and it will be their turn to cry "foul."

I'll try to keep my smile to myself.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 16, 2010 at 9:09 pm

"I would think having high intensity lighting, blaring PA systems "

u think

i think it that way 3 nights a year

on friday

over at 10

big whup


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ram's link to JAMA
a resident of Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
on Sep 16, 2010 at 10:03 pm

Ram-a giva JAMA*

say homework lika sledgehamma

don wanna school lika alabama

or student bed late in pajama

k?


* see Ram's link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 16, 2010 at 10:44 pm

If the prior two posts were written by current or former students of the Sequoia Union High School District, then supporting the local football team is truly the least of our problems.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ram's link to JAMA
a resident of Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
on Sep 17, 2010 at 8:32 am

Stanford.

You?

Quit being a twerp and have a little fun.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Scholar
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Sep 17, 2010 at 12:16 pm

How do you know if somebody went to Stanford?

When they first meet you, they will let it slip within the first three sentences.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Julie
a resident of another community
on Sep 17, 2010 at 12:26 pm

I would think that if you live in a home near a high school, you wouldn't be surprised that there are going to be night games during football season. As long as they end at a reasonable hour I don't see what the fuss is all about.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Sep 17, 2010 at 12:43 pm

In the Stanford graduate's defense, he or she did not let it drop until asked. And I thought the point made about twerpishness was a fairly good one. Certainly acceptable in arguing about something and staying within the bounds in good taste.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by TOM H
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 17, 2010 at 1:59 pm

[Post removed by Almanac Online staff.]


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lights are the least...
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Sep 17, 2010 at 2:47 pm

How do you get a Stanford Graduate off you front porch?
PAY HIM FOR THE PIZZA!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 17, 2010 at 3:36 pm

ouch


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 17, 2010 at 5:53 pm

Joe and Ram -

I never asked if anyone went to Stanford. In fact, I never asked anything at all, mainly because I don't care where you went to school, only that I can understand your post and point.

And there's almost nothing more twerpish than posting things that have no point.

Rama lama ding dong.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ram Duriseti
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 18, 2010 at 12:00 am

Wow. I'm not sure how I got dragged into this back and forth, but I only had one point to make to Mr. Carpenter above about the change in school start times.

Outside of that, I'm just a mildly amused observer.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Interested
a resident of another community
on Sep 18, 2010 at 1:57 am

What a sad commentary this is. We live in a country where so many parents are struggling just to encourage their children to go to school and stay there. These kids are bombarded day after day with videos and messages related to sex and drugs, that when we were young, would have been considered outrageous. Teen pregnancy, drug use, drop out rates, unemployment, unemployability are problems all parents are facing today...And whats YOUR problem...Well these darn kids want to have lights so they can play football...WAKE UP [portion removed]. Most people in this country would die to have your problems....

Take a good look outside of your little well-heeled bubble and count your blessings.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Annoyed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 18, 2010 at 9:25 am

Well said Interested and thanks for the reminder. As I said a number of days ago on this same posting site, we have many more important issues to deal with than lights at a high school.

As a community, we are lucky to have talented managers running MA and the District. MA is a very diverse school in terms of the student body and their backgrounds. This cannot be easy for the school leaders and their vision to make MA a great school overall is commendable.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Suggestive
a resident of another community
on Sep 19, 2010 at 8:45 am

Just schedule your outside Bar B Q's for nights when there are no games.
Har har har.

Peasantry.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 19, 2010 at 7:41 pm


Jefferson notches big win over Menlo-Atherton Friday night 17-0


Maybe night games aren't the answer.



 +   Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of another community
on Sep 20, 2010 at 12:37 am

Mr. Carpenter:

So, you are saying...

If the Bears visit to Daly City on Friday night resulted in a victory over Jeff, you would be supporting lights at MA?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 20, 2010 at 6:39 am

I am neither for or against lights on the football field.

The 17-0 loss under lights simply suggests that night games for M-A may not be all they have cracked up to be.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 20, 2010 at 8:07 am

Wow Peter,
Your sometimes sensible comments seem not, this time.

What in the world is your point. That having lights have some bearing on winning, or that winning is virtuous?

You do realize this was an away game. Daly City has lights, and they won.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 20, 2010 at 8:49 am

May I add, that the MA Bears JV squad won their game v. Daly City. The lights were not a factor, except that the game did not end in a tie.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Sep 20, 2010 at 9:14 am

I guess that my attempt at humor was too subtle - sorry.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by REALITY CHECK
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 20, 2010 at 9:44 am

Peter,
I think that a thank you is in order.

Humor can be difficult to express in email and forums, but I'll have to say, this topic deserves a lighter moment, here and there. Maybe too subtle, but still appreciated.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Sep 20, 2010 at 9:56 am

Thank you, Peter.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Glaring omission
a resident of Atherton: other
on Sep 20, 2010 at 10:14 am

"Sorry, Coach, I lost the ball in the lights"
" I don't want to make excuses, maybe if we could practice under lights on our home field we could
be used to them next time?"
"Sequoia has 'em, Paly has 'em, and most of our league opponents have them, why not us? Are we that poor a district?"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by WhoRUpeople
a resident of another community
on Sep 20, 2010 at 10:23 am

Reality Check-in your post thanking Peter, you made a subtle, but I think, important point I had not thought about. You mentioned that the lights didn't have an impact on the JV game--except it didn't end in a tie. If what your saying is that some games played at MA get called due to darkness - tie or no tie - that makes a case for lights I hadn't considered.

Also, while we're thanking people for humor to brighten our day, POGO, your rama lama ding dong comment had be LOL! Thanks!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,328 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 20 comments | 2,562 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,908 views

Charter School Proposal Steeped In Unintended Consequences
By Erin Glanville | 40 comments | 1,773 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 12 comments | 539 views