News


Portola Valley meets on affordable housing site

The Portola Valley Town Council plans to meet in closed session at 5 p.m. Monday, July 2, to discuss the terms for acquiring the 1.68-acre parcel at 900 Portola Road, the former home of Al's Nursery, where the town might build housing affordable to those with moderate incomes.

Town Attorney Sandy Sloan and council member Ann Wengert will negotiate with property owners Geoff and Colleen Tate, the town announced.

The discussion will include parcels owned by the town in the Blue Oaks subdivision. Officials have talked about selling the parcels to finance the purchase of the former nursery property.

The meeting takes place in the Historic Schoolhouse at 765 Portola Road in Portola Valley.

Click here to download the agenda.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by question
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jul 2, 2012 at 12:54 pm

I thought i saw a story a year or so ago that this site was going to be the new site for the Windmill Preschool. What happened to that deal?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by huh?
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jul 2, 2012 at 1:34 pm

I thought that Windmill School was buying this land? And were working together with the Town? Did Windmill back off, or is the Town being aggressive and competing (after cooperating) or did the seller's change their approach?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lane-Jacobson
a resident of Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
on Jul 5, 2012 at 4:32 pm

Moved to P.V. 48 years ago, (now Woodside) as the mail service changed our town back and forth several times. We have 5 acres on the corner of Portola Road and Farm Road. As the Town of Portola Valley is willing to get into the real estate and development business, perhaps we should look into selling our 5 acres to Woodside, knowing they too have been unable to fulfill the BMR request of the state. They could fit 40 homes on our land, perhaps resulting in 80 more cars trying to access Portola Road during morning rush hour. This would also allow 160 more people to live and work here, and approximately 400 more kids to go to the P.V. schools. I just hope the town doesn't get sued for anything, like kids falling into the creek, as no fences are allowed on the wild life corridor. If so-would the town then have to tax residents for millions of dollars to pay for all this? Am also wondering if any of this is legal, and how many on the town council live near this proposed project that would certainly devalue all near by properties.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Cho's, beloved dim sum spot, to reopen in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 5,252 views

Where DO The Elite Meet?
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 2,547 views

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 10 comments | 1,984 views

What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 8 comments | 330 views

Water Torture
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 309 views