News

Tonight: Menlo Park commission confirms specific plan recommendations, starts housing element update

Rarely does a week go by without mention of Menlo Park's downtown/El Camino Real specific plan, and that will continue to be the case for a while, now that the City Council has a chance to evaluate modifications proposed by the Planning Commission.

But first, the commission meets tonight (Nov. 18) to sign off on the recommendations. Those include:

● Allowing the city to evaluate proposed renovations for compliance with specific plan goals such as sidewalk width.

● Letting construction of a pedestrian-bicycle railroad undercrossing at Middle Avenue proceed regardless of the status of high-speed rail construction.

● Permitting some flexibility in building break, parking and setback requirements for parcels in the southeast portion of El Camino Real, which includes the Stanford lots, to allow the creation of an "optimal" public plaza at Middle Avenue.

● Creating a transportation management association, open to entities within the plan boundaries, to coordinate and monitor traffic-reduction measures.

See a summary of the Planning Commission's recommendations and staff analysis on the city's website.

Tonight's discussion will not revisit or reopen any topics. It is meant to confirm that the recommendations accurately reflect the commissioners intent and support (or lack thereof) for each item.

That's not the only item on the agenda. Also scheduled is a look at the second round of updates to the city's housing plan.

As part of this update cycle, Menlo Park must identify areas where homeless shelters could be permitted. The housing element steering committee has selected five sites for consideration -- at the intersection of Marsh Road and Haven Avenue; the Veterans Affairs campus on Willow Road; St. Patrick's Seminary campus on Middlefield Road; an area bounded by El Camino Real, Glenwood Avenue, San Mills Street and Oak Grove Avenue; and an area bounded by El Camino Real, Menlo Avenue, University Drive and Roble Avenue.

The committee ranked the first three sites as higher priority for consideration than the last two, according to the staff report.

Creation of an amnesty program for existing secondary, or "granny" units, is also part of this housing plan update.

Finally, Menlo Park must identify sites where 655 new dwelling units, with 233 allotted for very low-income residents, could be built. The requirements are dictated by state housing law; but according to the staff report, the city already has enough housing developments either in the pipeline or allowed for by existing zoning to meet the requirement without having to find additional locations.

The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7 p.m. Monday, Nov. 18, in the council chambers at the Civic Center at 701 Laurel St. The live meeting will be broadcast online.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Nov 18, 2013 at 3:09 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

In my opinion the PC is doing a superb job in this review and the recommendations being considered tonight reflect a great deal of both thought and citizen input.

After reading the Almanac story please follow the link provided in that story and take the time to read the staff report.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Nov 18, 2013 at 6:34 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Save Menlo needs to read this proposed recommendation from the Planning Commission:

For El Camino Real and Station Area zones, Human Scale is a goal parallel to "village character," the latter being relevant mainly to Downtown and Downtown Adjacent zones."

Note - "village character," the latter being relevant mainly to Downtown and Downtown Adjacent zones."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Fred Lippy
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Nov 19, 2013 at 1:24 pm

Stanford/Arrillaga's plan for the new development is 7 times the size/density of the Safeway across the street per Daily Post newspaper 11/19/13.

How do you like them apples Menlo Park citizens? Got traffic/congestion? Think the terrible traffic will get ANY better after it is done?

[Portion deleted.] Superb job on reviewing a MASSIVELY OVERBUILT development?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Nov 19, 2013 at 1:28 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

A grocery store by definition generates much more traffic per sq ft than does an office building.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Fred Lippy
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Nov 19, 2013 at 3:11 pm

I don't care Peter . . [portion deleted].


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Nov 19, 2013 at 3:15 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Those that ignore the facts will find that their pleas for attention will , properly, be ignored.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 2,791 views

WUE makes out-of-state tuition more affordable
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 2 comments | 2,730 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,316 views

Charter School Proposal Steeped In Unintended Consequences
By Erin Glanville | 38 comments | 1,594 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 7 comments | 297 views