News

Menlo Park commission: 'Just say no' for now to golf club well

In the two years since it first considered the idea of allowing a private club to tap an aquifer in a public park, Menlo Park's environmental quality commissioners have not changed their opinion of the proposal: Not now.

"We essentially reinforced our original recommendation but added the need to develop criteria for any water resource management issue in the city, and that this particular project shouldn't proceed further until all the points we raised were met," said Commissioner Chris DeCardy, summarizing the conclusions reached during a March 26 meeting where the proposal was revisited.

The Sharon Heights Golf and Country Club wants to drill a well that would draw water from a public aquifer to irrigate its golf course. The club now uses more than 60 million gallons of potable water per year, purchased from the Menlo Park Municipal Water District. The district in turn currently pulls 100 percent of its supply from the Hetch Hetchy reservoir.

The Environmental Quality Commission in 2012 unanimously recommended against going ahead with any specific proposals regarding ground water use until the city created a plan for using Menlo Park's graywater and clarified long-term groundwater rights with the county neither of which has been done. The Parks and Recreation Commission also expressed concerns about the potential public-private partnership.

Despite the reservations, what benefits could the well provide for the city? According to city staff, the well could save Menlo Park about $68,000 a year by also irrigating Nealon, Jack Lyle, and Sharon parks, along with La Entrada School, thereby reducing the city's demand for Hetch Hetchy water by 13 million gallons a year. In addition, the club would pay to build and operate the well; construction alone is estimated at $4 million.

"As the state continues to experience growth, more pressure may be placed on the Hetch Hetchy water system, and by using a diverse portfolio of water sources, the city can alleviate regional pressure while still securing adequate water supplies for residents and businesses," staff wrote in its report to the commission.

The residents belonging to "Nealon Neighbors" don't see any benefit at all, and have asked Menlo Park to abandon the project.

The group fears the depletion of a natural resource, and opposes the potential construction of a well in Nealon Park, which does not allow private uses without conditional permits. Another possible site on the short list -- Jack Lyle Park -- wouldn't require a permit, but still leaves other concerns.

Members also question whether the plan really reduces water use in the first place, or merely transfers the source.

Nealon Neighbors organizer Elizabeth Houck commented in an email to the city after the March 26 meeting that she applauded the commission's decision "to protect a precious natural resource as well as Open space and Conservation District and City Parks by your strongly worded recommendation to the Menlo Park City Council to cease all work on the potential well project and MOU with the private Sharon Heights Golf and Country Club."

Residents had felt ignored or dismissed when speaking against the proposal before, she said.

Ms. Houck said she hoped staff would explore drilling smaller wells that would water only the parks as an alternative to drawing upon the Hetch Hetchy reservoir, and put any money saved toward conservation incentives and water-rights oversight.

The City Council will make the final decision on whether to pursue the golf club partnership.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by SteveC
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Apr 3, 2014 at 9:08 am

SteveC is a registered user.

why can't water from the sewer treatment plant be used once processed. Can't be used for drinking but.......


 +   Like this comment
Posted by greenie
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Apr 3, 2014 at 11:23 am

how about menlo park for a change take seriously its commitment to climate change and a long term view? it's ridiculous to spend city funds on studying a proposal like this without first understanding how much water is in the aquifir, what is tapping into it, and what the future holds.

we can't keep blissfully ignoring that natural resources, especially water, are scarce


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ol' Hacker Homeboy
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Apr 4, 2014 at 1:06 pm

"Just say no" unless... every Menlo Park residential tax paying property owner is allowed to play Sharon Heights Golf Course, without being the guest of a member — and for a nominal 18 hole green fee similar to Crystal Springs (ie: $45). Heck, if our water is welcome on the golf course, why aren't we?
If not, perhaps the land needs to revert back to it's pre-1961 condition of empty rolling hills, dotted with a few roaming cows. Would that be so bad?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 4 comments | 1,585 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,218 views

Standardized Test Prep: When to Start and Whom to Hire?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,131 views

Finger Food and a Blood Lite?
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 873 views

Where the Sidewalk Ends
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 426 views