News

Nine purported gang members could face death penalty

Attorney asks DA's office to not prosecute as death penalty cases

Alleged members of three East Palo Alto gangs who were indicted for murder with special circumstances in March could face the death penalty, San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe said on April 14.

The nine defendants -- Roberto Bustos-Montes, 24; Nina Cragg, 23; Emmanuel Hyland, 25; Tyrone Love-Lopez, 21; Eric Valencia Vargas, 20; Marvin Ware, 26; Raymond Bradford, 28; Jerry Coneal III, 19; and Miguel Angel Rivera Jr., 23 -- are among 16 people who face charges that include murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to commit murder, dissuasion of witnesses and bribery, possession of firearms and attempted robbery.

The DA's office announced the indictments on March 24. They include a string of alleged crimes stretching from San Francisco to East Palo Alto between September 2012 and December 2013.

All 16 are alleged members or associates of the Da Vill, Sac Street and Taliban gangs, who were at war with each other during this time, according to the DA's office.

The murder charges stem from four homicides: the shootings of Christopher Baker, 21, in East Palo Alto on Oct. 5, 2012; Stoney Gipson of San Francisco on Oct. 27, 2012; and East Palo Alto residents Jonathan Alcazar, 24, on Jan. 14, 2013, and Lamont Coleman, 21, on Jan. 26, 2013, according to the DA's office.

Paul DeMeester, the attorney representing Bustos-Montes through the county's private defender program, has called for the DA's office to not prosecute the nine as death penalty cases. He has cited the costs of death penalty trials as the principal reason, Mr. Wagstaffe said.

But the majority of California voters rejected eliminating the death penalty in 2012, he noted.

"What Paul is asking us to do is to override California law," he said.

Mr. DeMeester could not be reached for comment.

Mr. Wagstaffe said that if found guilty, the defendants could receive the death penalty or life in prison without the possibility of parole due to the fact that the murders were committed as gang killings and some defendants have been charged with multiple murders.

But he cautioned that his office has not yet decided on whether to pursue the death penalty in any of the cases.

"Any time you are dealing with multiple murders, the death penalty is a topic of discussion," he said. "We want to give the defense a chance to present mitigating evidence. The nine people are technically eligible for it, but their involvement is dramatically different."

He added that his office will consider factors such as the role each defendant played in the murders and whether they have a longer track record of crime.

The costs of prosecuting death-penalty cases would not be a hindrance, he said.

"I'm cognizant of taxpayer resources. But you could make the argument, why even charge anyone with murder because of the costs of prosecuting the case? You could prosecute it on a (lesser charge) and save a lot of money," he said.

Mr. Wagstaffe said the DA's office wants families in East Palo Alto to feel safe in their homes and when they walk down the street. Since the arrests, he has heard reports from police that the streets have been quiet.

Most of the defendants appeared in court on Friday, April 11. Judge John Grandsaert postponed their hearings to await the availability of the grand jury transcript. The case was reset to June 16 for entry of pleas and to set jury trial and pretrial conference dates.

Comments

Posted by long time EPA resident, a resident of another community
on Apr 17, 2014 at 12:48 pm

Those who killed without giving it a second thought and ruined many families are scared of paying for their crimes by death?


Posted by long time resident, a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Apr 17, 2014 at 1:32 pm

While I do not favor the death penalty, I do like very much a sentence of life without parole. Not only does it cost the state (US!) much less, but also it gives the perpetrators a long time to consider how they lived their lives and perhaps repent. The death penalty is an easy way to deal with issues, but it's in the "eye for an eye..." category. As Gandhi observed, it makes the whole world blind!


Posted by Spammy, a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Apr 17, 2014 at 9:52 pm

Bummer man !


Posted by SteveC, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Apr 18, 2014 at 7:28 am

SteveC is a registered user.

They should receive the golden needle award. It was their decision to take the lives of others.


Posted by Inspector Clouseau, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Apr 18, 2014 at 7:46 am

Is the article referring to the 9 former MP mayors?


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Scott’s Seafood Mountain View to close, reopen as new concept
By Elena Kadvany | 13 comments | 4,030 views

When Grandparents Visit
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 712 views

Freshman Blues Don't Mean Wrong College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 633 views

Having A Hard Time Getting Your Child To Dive Into Their Summer Reading? Take A Trip To Bookopolis…
By Erin Glanville | 0 comments | 596 views

Background and Ideas for the Comp Plan
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 499 views