News

Menlo Park hires consultant to analyze specific plan initiative impacts

Carpenter files complaint with state commission over Save Menlo's status

As city and county officials work on the painstaking process of verifying the signatures of registered Menlo Park voters submitted as part of an initiative by Save Menlo to change the downtown/El Camino Real specific plan, other analyses are also underway.

Menlo Park has hired Lisa Wise Consulting Inc., based in San Francisco, to perform an independent review of how the initiative would affect the specific plan, with a preliminary report complete by the end of June.

The company has extensive experience with municipal land-use planning for jurisdictions such as Alameda County and Richmond. According to both city officials and Ms. Wise, it has never worked with the two major developers whose proposed projects would be impacted by the initiative -- Stanford University and Greenheart Land Company -- or with the city of Menlo Park.

The $148,420 contract includes evaluating what effects the initiative's changes would have on development feasibility, infrastructure and finance. Two meetings will be held with city representatives, and up to two meetings will be conducted with the public.

The fee includes a 15 percent contingency fee, according to the contract, which may or may not be used. A staff report presented to the council cited the total amount as $130,294.

According to the city's summary, Save Menlo's initiative limits the amount of office space in any individual development to 100,000 square feet; and caps total new office space to 240,820 square feet and overall new, non-residential development to 474,000 square feet within the specific plan's boundaries.

The initiative would also redefine open space to mean only areas no higher than 4 feet off the ground, thereby preventing balconies from counting as open space.

Voter approval would be needed to revise the ordinance or to exceed the size limits for office and non-residential development.

The initiative would impact two mixed-use development proposals already in the works by cutting the amount of office space allowed in each project by about 50 percent.

Stanford University and developer John Arrillaga want to build a complex on the mostly vacant car lots along 300 to 500 El Camino Real. The 8.4-acre project would involve 199,500 square feet of office space, 10,000 square feet of retail, and up to 170 apartments.

The mixed-use complex initially contained medical offices and fewer apartments, but Stanford revised the project after a series of discussions with city officials and Save Menlo representatives.

A second project, designed by Greenheart LLC, would put 210,000 square feet of office space, 210,000 square feet of apartments, and 13,000 square feet of retail on the 7-acre site located at 1300 El Camino Real and Oak Grove Avenue.

FPPC Complaint

Like its initiative, Save Menlo is also coming under scrutiny. Atherton resident and community activist Peter Carpenter, who has been speaking out against the initiative, filed a complaint with the Fair Political Practices Commission on May 16 alleging that the group is masquerading as a general purpose committee when it is actually a ballot- measure committee.

The latter would be required to file quarterly public disclosure reports that would provide a look at who has donated to the group and how the money is being spent, he said.

According to the FPPC, a general purpose committee may support or oppose a variety of candidates and ballot measures. Whether a group is classified as a "primarily formed" committee in this case, a ballot measure committee depends on whether it spends more than 70 percent of its funds on a single candidate or measure.

Save Menlo spokesperson Perla Ni said the group's goals are "are long-term and not primarily for a particular election, so we are correctly formed as a general purpose committee."

As a general purpose committee, she said, the reports are due every six months, with the next one due at the end of June.

Save Menlo can, as a general purpose committee, support City Council candidates as well as the initiative if necessary during the fall election, according to Ms. Ni, but its work won't be done. The group "has every reason to believe its efforts to protect a livable walkable community will be necessary for a long time, not just this election cycle."

The most recent financial report available covers the committee's activities from July 1 through Dec. 31 -- a period before the drive to collect signatures to get the initiative on the November election ballot began. At that point, it had collected $16,500 in donations and spent about $5,330.

The largest expenditure during that period -- $5,000 -- went to Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, a law firm specializing in land-use issues that has popped up in other Menlo Park battles. The firm was also retained by a group of downtown business and property owners unhappy with the way the specific plan's environmental impact analysis was conducted prior to the plan's adoption.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Really Again?
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 20, 2014 at 3:27 pm

Wow The City Manager is spending more on consultants!! Shocker!!! Someone should ask to tabulate the total expenditure on consultants since this "Leader from Behind" has taken over.

Shameful that our money is being wasted because The City Manager won't make any decisions in his job.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Roy Thiele-Sardiña
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 20, 2014 at 4:13 pm

Roy Thiele-Sardiña is a registered user.

Since the Lanza/Fry group is only saying too much traffic, without any specifics about how their proposal will save, the burden of determining that falls to the City.

They will need this information to decide on their response to the initiative.

With regard to the FPPC complaint, if they are just support this initiative (70% of $ raised) then they ARE a single purpose committee. If they are planning on spending all that money on candidates, Did they tell their donors who they were supporting?

Roy


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on May 20, 2014 at 8:15 pm

"Did they tell their donors who they were supporting?"

Nope


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Opening alert: Zola, in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 3,604 views

Middle Class Scholarship for incomes up to $150,000!
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 6 comments | 2,479 views

Men Are Good For Three Things
By Laura Stec | 23 comments | 2,458 views

Menlo Park – Close to the Action
By Paul Bendix | 0 comments | 402 views

Helping Local Veterans
By Erin Glanville | 0 comments | 61 views