Menlo Park reaches tentative agreement with employees' union

Menlo Park has reached a tentative agreement with the Service Employees International Union, the city announced Monday. The one-year contract includes a 4.5 percent pay raise, four hours less paid time off, and maintains employee contributions toward retirement benefits at the levels set in 2011.

SEIU represents approximately 134 city employees. According to the staff report, the union's members last received raises in 2008.

As it did during negotiations with the police sergeants union, Menlo Park decided to keep using binding arbitration for misconduct cases, but with a few tweaks.

The union contracts bifurcate the appeals process, using one procedure for grievances, such as labor violations, and another for appealing discipline more severe than a letter of reprimand, such as suspension or termination.

The city and union would now be able to select an arbitrator from a pool of retired San Mateo County judges, according to the contract. But the arbitrator's decision would still be final.

Another change is the creation of a labor management committee that will meet at least once per quarter to discuss retirement benefits and related potential future cost increases.

The staff report estimates the SEIU contract will cost the city an additional $904,000 a year. The City Council is scheduled to vote on the proposed SEIU contract on July 15.

Vasquez case

The Almanac broke the story last year about the arrest, firing and reinstatement of veteran Menlo Park police officer Jeffrey Vasquez.

The veteran police officer, fired after being caught naked with a prostitute in a motel room and reportedly admitting that wasn't the first time he'd solicited a hooker for sex, was reinstated through binding arbitration and awarded $188,000 in back pay.

Were the Vasquez case to occur under the new arbitration process, it would end the same way should the arbitrator rule to revoke the officer's termination.

Binding arbitration decisions in police misconduct remain confidential unless both parties agree to release the information. The Almanac obtained 17 redacted decisions from multiple California jurisdictions. The reversal rate? About 59 percent. Arbitrators reinstated the officers nine times, and shortened one suspension. They upheld terminations in the remaining seven cases.

Academic studies of similar binding arbitration cases in Chicago and Houston show approximately the same reversal rate.


There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Draeger’s Los Altos eyes upgrades, expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,988 views

Housing is for People
By Steve Levy | 26 comments | 1,985 views

College Visit: Lehigh and Lafayette
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 4 comments | 1,360 views

Is Coffee a Date?
By Laura Stec | 12 comments | 819 views

Gratitude, Repairing and Avoiding Affairs
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 509 views