News

Ex-police officer sues Menlo Park over firing

Claims alleged history of lying to supervisors should not have been considered

Rolando Igno, formerly of the Menlo Park Police Department, has filed a lawsuit against the city on grounds that previous allegations of lying to his supervisors should not have been considered in a recent decision to terminate his employment.

This story contains 740 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Sandy
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Aug 4, 2014 at 7:54 pm

This officer should have been fired a long time ago. He was given plenty of opportunity to change his behavior. Additionally, a history of lying makes me wonder how often he has lied in court. If he was testifying against me in court, I'd be sure to point out his history of lying. When I saw his name, I thought this was going to be another of those 'race-card' claims. He deserves to be fired. I


Like this comment
Posted by Unreal
a resident of Atherton: other
on Aug 4, 2014 at 11:13 pm

I expect this cop will get reinstated. It's a crying shame that in California we cannot fire a police officer who commits misconduct, for example, the Menlo Park cop who was caught with a prostitute. The police unions have their secret weapon: binding arbitration. The arbitrator won't go against the cops, since they want to continue to get hired at very high rates the next time a cop commits misconduct and a city tries to rid itself of him. This includes ex San Mateo county judges who serve as arbitrators. It really doesn't matter who the arbitrator is; the monetary incentive is there. There is simply NO valid reason these cops as well as other municipal employees shouldn't have to go to court to litigate their grievances. It's not a perfect system, to be sure, but is much better than this sham arbitration.

Multiple cases of lying to his superior? We all know in the private sector it would take only one such occurrence to cement a lawful firing. This racket has to stop.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Nitro cold-brew, early hours: What's new at ZombieRunner in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 1 comment | 6,942 views

Heart Pounding, Hands Cold and Sweating
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,011 views