Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
Almanac News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Stanford plan may mean big bump in traffic
Application for medical-center redevelopment kicks off Palo Alto evaluation process

Bookmark and Share
With a voluminous application submitted Monday to the city of Palo Alto, Stanford Medical Center officials revealed additional details about one of the biggest development projects ever proposed in Palo Alto.

The application provides the first traffic counts associated with the project, numbers sure to challenge Palo Alto's anti-auto activists.

The new medical complex -- including Stanford Hospital, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and office buildings -- is expected to add nearly 1,100 vehicle trips during morning commute hours and 976 trips to the afternoon peak by 2020, according to a study by Walnut Creek-based Fehr & Peers produced for Stanford University.

Existing facilities currently produce 1,671 morning trips and 1,585 during the afternoon, the study states.

The whole complex would require more than 3,000 new parking spaces.

Mark Tortorich, Stanford hospitals' vice president for planning, design and construction, emphasized the traffic projection is long-term. He called it "proportional to our growth."

Stanford Medical Center is proposing a complex demolition/retrofitting/new construction project that would add a net 723,800 square feet to Stanford Hospital, 401,500 to the Children's Hospital, a complete replacement of 415,000 square feet of medical school buildings and about 186,000 additional square feet of office space.

To accommodate the redevelopment, Stanford officials propose creating a new zoning district for the area, perhaps known as a "Hospital District." That district would allow the height, size and design criteria proposed for the medical center, which otherwise exceed current zoning regulations.

The new Stanford Hospital would have three 130-foot towers (eight stories) and the Children's Hospital expansion would rise about 85 feet, shattering the city's current height limit of 50 feet.

Stanford officials also hope the new zone, if accepted by the city, would offer flexibility so the project could be tweaked, even after it is approved, Tortorich said.

"We know from our experience with health-care facilities (that) health-care technology is rapidly changing," Tortorich said. The flexibility is needed so the project managers can respond to the technology changes, he said.

Modern hospitals are tall to allow for patients to be transported privately and quickly via elevators and to maximize land use, according to Tortorich and the application.

Stanford points out in its application that several local buildings are also that tall, including Palo Alto City Hall at 127 feet and the residential 101 Alma St., which is 140 feet tall.

Tortorich also said the hospital, if constructed vertically, would provide more open space within the medical complex.

The application also briefly referred to another contentious issue -- the amount of affordable housing Stanford will have to provide, noting only that it will be "addressed as part of the project review" process.

Several Palo Alto City Council members have said they expect a housing contribution from Stanford as part of the project.

The application also includes the projected number of new jobs -- nearly 2,000 -- the massive expansion will produce by approximately 2020. That figure is lower than a previous estimate of 2,500 new jobs.

Currently the medical center employs approximately 6,850 people.

The estimate dropped because some of the added space is to reduce crowding, rather than add new services or patient space, according to a summary of the application.

Although the application doesn't contain design details, it depicts the Children's Hospital addition as two sweeping half-circle-shaped towers.

Tortorich said benefactor Lucile Packard asked to make the hospital as humane as possible and that curves are considered friendlier to children.

The 64-acre site is located generally between Quarry Road, Pasteur Drive and Welch Road. The project also includes the Hoover Pavilion site across Quarry Road from the Stanford Shopping Center. The Hoover Pavilion would be retained and used as physicians' offices, with additional buildings constructed nearby.

Emergency-room access would be oriented toward, and closer to, Sand Hill Road. Two driveways (one existing) would connect the entire site with Sand Hill Road

The project originated because Stanford Medical Center, like hospitals throughout California, was required by state law to fortify its facilities to withstand earthquakes by 2013, with more stringent standards taking effect in 2030.

Merely rehabbing the structures, some built in the 1950s, wouldn't be cost-effective or allow Stanford's medical care and research programs to remain top-notch, Stanford officials have said.

Patients would not need to share a room at either of the hospitals following the expansion, Stanford officials have said. The project would add 144 beds to Stanford Hospital's total capacity and 104 beds to the Children's Hospital while demolishing the original 1959 Stanford Hospital, as well as several other buildings. The 16-year-old Children's Hospital would be retained and expanded.

The total cost would exceed $1 billion, Tortorich said Wednesday.

Stanford hopes to begin construction in 2010. Detailed drawings are expected in December with a draft of an environmental report released in March 2008.

The City Council will next discuss the project Sept. 24 to clarify its expectations for the environmental report.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by worried, a resident of the Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park neighborhood, on Aug 17, 2007 at 8:25 am

Menlo Park officials need to understand as soon as possible what impact this traffic will have on our community, especially along Sand Hill Rd. and El Camino Real. Then they need to be very vocal and influential to minimize harm to Menlo Park. Ideally, they could make some things even better.

El Camino traffic south bound is already affected by the overly long north bound light at Cambridge to allow lots of cars and trucks to do a u-turn because Sand Hill does not connect to Alma. This delay already backs up traffic within Menlo Park.

Bicycle connections along and across El Camino/Alma and along Sand Hill Road near El Camino are unsafe today. Doubling Stanford's traffic will make this even more hazardous.

Menlo Park cannot afford to sit back.


Posted by flush, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Aug 17, 2007 at 11:24 am

As stated in the P(o)rk Theatre blog, neither Fergusson nor Robinson can participate in any discussions re: Stanford, as Fergusson's hubby is employed at Stanford Hospital, and Robinson's wife is an assoc. prof there. So unless the other 3 council members go to bat for Menlo, Stanford and Palo Alto will once again ignore their development impacts on Menlo's streets. A no U turn at Cambridge is a start to send a clear message that Palo Alto needs to both open up Alma (North PA is now protected with Alma-Hawthorne,Everett turn restrictions, traffic circles, etc. so that long standing excuse to not open Alma is specious) and to insist on widening Sand Hill west to a full four (4) lanes from ECR to Arboretum. With the dozen signals on Sand Hill, there is still a lot of cut through commute traffic in Allied Arts and West Menlo because Sand Hill is a gridlocked parking lot at rush hour. Don't expect Boyle to champion this overdue change, even though he started on the Transportation Commission. He would love to see Fergusson and Cohen replaced next fall with like minded friendlies. So this will take a concerted effort by Menlo residents during the PA EIR review process next spring.


Posted by apathy prevails in Menlo Park, a resident of the Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks neighborhood, on Aug 18, 2007 at 1:26 pm

There's an identical post to this one on the Palo Alto Town Square. Dozens of people have posted. What is it with you people? Don't you care about ANYTHING unless it's next door to you? Or are you aware but merely resigned to your fate, assuming that you can do nothing to affect this project? Or are you simply one of those people who cruises through life blissfully unaware of everything and perfectly content just to let your housekeeper, nanny, gardener, and therapist cope with reality for you?


Posted by Seen it before, a resident of the Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks neighborhood, on Aug 23, 2007 at 3:01 pm

Stanford has a lot of loyal alumni in Menlo Park and most of them seem to think their beloved alma mater can do no wrong. However, Stanford the university and Stanford the money-making machine are two very different entities.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.