Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
Almanac News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Fire sprinkler debate returns to Menlo Park  

Bookmark and Share
The touchy debate over whether fire sprinklers should be required in more Menlo Park homes will resurface at a City Council study session scheduled for Tuesday, Sept. 11.

The meeting is scheduled to start at 5:30 p.m. in the council chambers at the Civic Center, between Laurel and Alma streets.

The council will discuss an ordinance proposed by Menlo Park Fire Protection District officials that would require sprinklers in the following cases:

-- New single-family homes of more than 1,000 square feet.

-- Homes where more than 50 percent of the structure is to be remodeled.

-- All planned buildings with a basement of more than 250 square feet.

The ordinance would not apply to existing homes, unless they underwent a major remodel. Sprinklers are already required in most new commercial buildings and multi-family homes.

Since the Sept. 11 discussion is a study session, the council will not vote on the ordinance, but could decide to schedule the matter for an upcoming meeting.

Prickly issue

Although similar ordinances have been adopted in East Palo Alto and Atherton, the sprinkler debate has proven particularly contentious in Menlo Park.

Fire district officials say sprinklers save the lives of residents and firefighters, but some residents and developers have argued that high installation costs and potential water damage outweigh the safety benefits.

In 2004 and 2005, fire district officials pushed the council to adopt the ordinance, but then-council members Lee Duboc, Nicholas Jellins and Mickie Winkler opposed the changes.

After the three council members left office in December, fire district officials urged the new council to take another look at the ordinance.

"This is going to be a preliminary discussion," said Mayor Kelly Fergusson, who has supported stricter sprinkler guidelines in the past. "If we want to really consider additional fire sprinkler guidelines -- and that's a big if -- we need to consider how expensive it could be for builders and homeowners."

Councilman Andy Cohen said sprinklers should be required in remodeled homes that add a basement, but wasn't sure about other situations.

Councilman John Boyle said he will go into the meeting with "an open mind," but acknowledged he's "nervous" that a sprinkler ordinance might make it too costly for residents to remodel homes.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments

Posted by wondering, a resident of the Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park neighborhood, on Sep 10, 2007 at 5:08 pm

The article says that sprinklers are already mandated in EPA and Atherton. What about Palo Alto, Portola Valley, and various other surrounding communities?


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.