Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
Almanac News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Lawsuits settled for East Palo Alto plane crash
Details not released on the three settlements with victims' families

Bookmark and Share
More than two and a half years after a small plane slammed into an East Palo Alto neighborhood and cut power to Palo Alto, three lawsuits stemming from the fatal, Feb. 17, 2010, crash have been settled, according to court papers filed in San Mateo County Superior Court.

Tesla Motors employees Brian Finn, 42, Andrew Ingram, 31, and pilot Douglas Bourn, 56, were killed in the fiery crash after Bourn's Cessna 310R clipped high-voltage power lines and a utility tower in dense fog at 7:55 a.m., then slammed into homes on Beech Street, destroying one and damaging several others.

Notices that three lawsuits were settled -- with Ingram's parents and aunt, Finn's wife and daughter, and East Palo Alto residents Ervin and Pinkie Hudleton -- were filed Sept. 4-10.

Settlement details have not been released.

Two other suits -- filed by East Palo Alto residents Lisa Jones and Jose Cortez-Herrera -- have not been settled, according to court records. Jones' lawsuit was filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court.

Bourn was a senior engineer from Santa Clara; Finn a senior manager from East Palo Alto; and Ingram an engineer who lived in Palo Alto. The trio had just taken off from the Palo Alto Airport en route to Hawthorne, California, for a business meeting at one of Tesla's facilities.

Air-traffic-control tapes indicated Bourn took off in heavy fog. An air-traffic controller had warned him that he was flying at his own risk. Bourn said he understood.

Within minutes after takeoff, the plane hit the Pacific Gas & Electric tower and power lines a half-mile northwest of the airport runway. Parts of the aircraft then crashed into Jones' day care center and home, the Hudletons' carport and car, and the garage of an adjacent home. The fuselage ricocheted off a retaining wall in front of the Cortez-Herrera house and exploded in flames, singeing the home and causing smoke damage, family members said after the crash.

Investigators ruled out mechanical failure as the cause of the crash. Pilot error was the probable cause, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined in November 2011.

On Aug. 17, 2010, the Ingrams sued Bourn's estate and his Santa Clara company, Air Unique. The court combined their suit with the Hudletons' and that of Finn's wife, Sherina Yuk Chan. The three lawsuits alleged negligence on Bourn's part for willingly taking off in unsafe conditions and because he did not follow his flight plan. At the time of the crash, visibility was less than one-eighth, according the NTSB investigation.

Bourn was supposed to make "a right turn to a heading of 060 degrees within 1 mile of the airport." Instead, radar data showed the plane turned 45 degrees to the left after takeoff.

In July, Bourn's estate filed a summary-judgment motion to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that -- because Finn, Ingram and Bourn were on a business trip -- their deaths were covered by Tesla's workers' compensation.

The estate lawyers argued that a claim of negligence is barred because the California Worker's Compensation Act provides workers' compensation as the exclusive remedy for injuries or death to coworkers. Zurich North America, which was handling workers' compensation for Tesla, had already determined that compensation would be made, but as of March 3 it had been "delaying death benefits pending the result of its dependency investigation," according to court documents.

The summary-judgment motion was to be heard on Sept. 27. A 10-day trial was scheduled for Nov. 19. Instead, notice of settlement and a request for case dismissals were filed for the Ingrams, Chan, and the Hudletons. A final hearing to show cause for the dismissal is scheduled for Jan. 8, 2013.

The plaintiffs, their attorneys and defense attorneys for Bourn's estate did not return calls for comment.

Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.


Comments
There are no comments yet for this story.
Be the first!

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.
Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Choose a category: *
Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square!
Please choose a category below that best describes this story.

Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.