|
|
|
Uploaded: Thursday, August 25, 2011, 11:47 AM
Council election in Woodside, not Portola Valley
|
|
by Dave Boyce
Almanac Staff
Tradition has held once again in Woodside and Portola Valley. With four candidates running unopposed for the town council this fall in Woodside and two running unopposed in Portola Valley, one town will have an election and the other will have the new members appointed in December.
The councils met in their respective chambers on Wednesday, Aug. 24, to address the matter.
Woodside goes for an election
With Woodside Mayor Ron Romines and councilmen Dave Burow and Peter Mason recusing themselves and temporarily out of the room because they are running for re-election, the remaining members voted 4-0 to spend about $10,000 and have an election this fall.
Three-term incumbent Sue Boynton stayed to vote because she is not running again; investment banker Tom Shanahan is running unopposed for the fourth open seat.
After informing the council of one downside of an election, the cost, Woodside Town Manager Susan George noted two upsides: write-in candidates can run and the nominated candidates, rather than being appointed, have the distinction of being duly elected.
In 1997, a write-in candidate ran and defeated the nominated candidate for the District 2 seat on the Woodside council, Ms. George said.
The window during which a write-in candidate can file with the elections office opens Monday, Sept. 12, and closes Tuesday, Oct. 25, San Mateo County Elections Officer David Tom said. The candidate must file a declaration of candidacy and collect signatures like a nominated candidate. Candidates should check with the Woodside town clerk, Mr. Tom said.
During the public comment period, in an otherwise mostly empty Woodside chamber occupied by one reporter and one visitor from Atherton Mr. Romines returned to briefly testify as a resident.
"I just think that, on balance, democratic processes suggest that we should go ahead and have an election," he said at the public's microphone. "Nominees should appear on the ballot." Mr. Romines then departed the room again.
Councilwoman Deborah Gordon agreed. Elections allow candidates to meet constituents, she said, and the cost, given the town's strong fiscal state, is not an issue.
"We should go ahead and allow the public to participate," she said. "I'm disappointed that there doesn't seem to be more interest in running from other people."
An election "shows we're trying to be very correct in our behavior," Councilwoman Anne Kasten added.
No election for Portola Valley
In Portola Valley, the town clerk recommended against an election, citing the $10,000 cost, and the council agreed.
"I think we cancel," Councilman John Richards said.
Councilman Steve Toben raised his thumb in agreement.
There being no other comments and no comment from the public in a chamber empty but for one reporter, the council voted 3-0 to cancel the election, with Mayor Ted Driscoll absent and Councilwoman Ann Wengert abstaining because she is running for re-election.
Vice-mayor Maryann Derwin ran the meeting.
Are you receiving Express, our free daily e-mail edition? See a sample and sign-up for Express.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by Jim , a resident of the Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley neighborhood, on Sep 2, 2011 at 6:18 pm Portola Valley should have an election as well . Things are pretty stale down there at town hall . Portola Valley needs some new blood in the Town government.The current powers that be are all JERKS !!!
|
|
Posted by Meenlo Voter, a resident of the Menlo Park: other neighborhood, on Sep 2, 2011 at 7:49 pm When will you be throwing your hat in the ring Jim?
|
|
Posted by POGO, a resident of the Woodside: other neighborhood, on Sep 2, 2011 at 8:46 pm MV -
You got to say that before I did!
|
|
|
| |
|