Viewpoint - July 7, 2010

Guest opinion: Renegotiate labor contracts for garbage service

by Heyward Robinson

Garbage rates for Menlo Park have increased dramatically in recent years, rising 18 percent in 2009 and 28 percent in 2010.

Other jurisdictions within the South Bay Waste Management Authority (SBWMA) have experienced similar increases. Skyrocketing labor rates are behind much of the increase. Amazingly, while most of the country experienced significant reductions in income after September 2008, the Teamsters negotiated contracts stipulating 27 percent salary and 47 percent pension increases for their members. These five-year agreements will continue to put upward pressure on garbage rates until 2014.

The primary reason these rates have been allowed to increase so dramatically is that the ratepayer has not been represented at the bargaining table. Instead, whatever labor costs the contractor and the union agree to are passed directly on to the ratepayer. Until now, these pass-throughs have been unchallenged by the waste management authority, its auditor, the cities and other jurisdictions responsible for setting local garbage rates, or the public. That needs to change.

On Jan. 1, 2011, Recology will replace Allied Waste as the garbage contractor. In addition to the wage and pension increases, the contracts contain provisions for increasing unpaid leave and liberalizing the substance abuse policy that only take effect when Recology inherits the contracts. Recology did not participate in the negotiation of the contracts, but nevertheless has agreed to honor them. They did so in the interest of "labor peace," but at the expense of higher costs to the ratepayer.

The inappropriate and disproportionate wage and pension increases, coupled with the new provisions, provide ample reason to request renegotiation of the labor contracts when Recology takes over. Any new negotiations must include elected officials and/or others who can represent the interests of the ratepayers.

Labor leaders have repeatedly stated that they want to partner with cities and counties as we wrestle with the realities of the "new economy." Agreeing to renegotiate these contracts will demonstrate that they are serious about this pledge.

Heyward Robinson

Menlo Park City Council member


Posted by A voter who has changed her mind., a resident of Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
on Jul 22, 2010 at 4:06 pm

Do you really expect us to buy into this disingenuous garbage talk?
Good luck with that.
As a former council member recently countered to you -
"Have you forgotten that you directly and indirectly approved all the actions that resulted in the negotiated wage rates with the Teamsters, the bloated management salaries and benefits, the worker retention policy, and the selection of a Teamster-owned company? Shame on you for trying to deny your responsibility when you were Mayor and trying to act like the taxpayer champion now that you are a City Council Candidate. Frankly, your newly found concern rings hollow."

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields