Almanac

Viewpoint - August 4, 2010

Editorial: Hard choices in Menlo Park

When John Boyle decided to join Andy Cohen and vote against placing a hotel tax increase before voters in November, it shocked his colleagues on the Menlo Park City Council who lost the 4-1 majority needed to act on a tax measure, and tossed a structural budget deficit right back in their laps.

The council had hoped to cover some of the red ink in future budgets with income from the tax, which is assessed on visitors who stay overnight in a hotel or motel room. If passed by city voters, the heftier tax was expected to produce an additional $500,000, which would have been a big help in closing the deficit. Now, with that choice off the table, the council's option to raise revenue — increasing the utility users tax, which would impact all residents, not just visitors — is an idea that is not popular with most council members in an election year.

Mr. Boyle was no doubt swayed by testimony from managers of the Stanford Park and Rosewood hotels, who registered strong opposition to increasing the tax from 10 to 12 percent. They said it would hit particularly hard during the economic downturn. Stanford Park manager Glen Alden said business is down more than 20 percent, leading to workforce cuts of 19 percent since 2007. Speaking for the Rosewood, which just opened last year, Michael Casey also cautioned the council about approving the tax, saying, "Raising it is a risk," not only to the hotels but to other Menlo Park businesses that benefit from the trade the hotels bring to town.

So now that the hotel tax is off the table for at least three years, it is time for the council to tell city manager Glen Rojas to bring them a balanced budget, even if it means reducing staff positions or, heaven forbid, doing without two or three police officers.

If Mayor Rich Cline and Councilman Heyward Robinson, who both are running for re-election, want to score points with Menlo Park voters, they need to give up any thoughts of raising taxes and focus on bringing expenses into line. Local residents, like many others on the Peninsula, are suffering from the slow economy and are not in the mood to vote yes on a tax increase, even if it is imposed on visitors to the city. And although the council can raise the utility tax on its own without approval of the voters, such a choice would not be wise at this time.

And if the structural deficit of about $500,000 wasn't bad enough, the city finance director said late last week that sales tax collections for the first six months of the year could be as much as $2 million below the estimate, although she hopes the calculation is a mistake. If the council is forced to cover such a huge shortfall without borrowing from reserves or adding new taxes, some staff members will have to be let go.

The upshot for Menlo Park: Despite the possible bad economic news, the city should be able to trim its sails and balance its budget. With more than $25 million in reserves, it is not time to push the panic button. Nevertheless, the council must cope with some hard choices in the days ahead.

Comments

Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Aug 3, 2010 at 5:05 pm

Why is any of this a surprise?

The Council was told in December 2008 that they needed revenues would be going down and that they needed to start cutting expenditures. They did nothing and now the gap between revenues and expenditures is growing. The taxpayers will not tolerate further increases in taxes masquerading as "fees" so the Council had better start making hard choices on reducing expenditures. Rather than nickle and dime the issue they might start with an honest discussion on the pros and cons of outsourcing police services which could save $7 million EVERY YEAR.


Posted by out town, a resident of Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
on Aug 3, 2010 at 11:16 pm

[Post removed. Please avoid attacking other posters.]


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields