Almanac

News - September 29, 2010

Public invited to candidate forums

The League of Women Voters is inviting the public to several candidate forums over the next week in connection with the Nov. 2 election. Among them:

• Candidates for the Menlo Park City Council will answer questions at a forum from 7 to 9:30 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 29, at the council chambers in the Menlo Park Civic Center. The forum is sponsored by the Menlo Park Chamber of Commerce and the South San Mateo County League of Women Voters.

• Candidates for the Atherton City Council will participate in a forum at 7 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 30, in the Pavilion at Holbrook-Palmer Park, off Watkins Avenue just east of El Camino Real in Atherton. Candidates will make opening statements, then respond to questions submitted by attendees during the forum, sponsored by the Atherton Civic Interest League and the League of Women Voters.

• Candidates for the District 3 San Mateo County supervisor's seat will participate in a forum from 7 to 8:30 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 28, at the Redwood Shores Branch Library, 399 Marine Parkway, Redwood City.

Comments

Posted by Menlo Observor, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 28, 2010 at 1:09 pm

It is funny how the LWV claims to be non-partisan; but if you look at their political registration it is overwhelmingly democratic as are the measures they support.


Posted by Outside Looking In, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 30, 2010 at 12:45 am

1 of 2 posts

Hands down, Ohtaki was the winner tonight! Bernstein was a close second!

Synopsis of the debate:

1) Ohtaki was clearly the expert on finances and disaster preparedness. He was articulate, calm, and factual. He understands setting priorities, instead of "micromanaging the size of a lawn." He is the only candidate with financial expertise and disaster preparedness and relief experience.

2) Bernstein was very passionate. He has a high level of integrity and a strong moral compass. His presence was definitely felt, and he seemed to channel the outrage people have toward politicians who do things to fulfill their political ambitions.

3) Keith is like a mini-Kelly Fergusson. Mary Gilles hit the nail on the head about the ridiculous solution of raising the UUT to pay City personnel! The UUT was already controversial enough and should not be used to sustain an unsustainable budget. At least, she was honest, but still... caveat emptor!

4) Peterson was entertaining but is not serious candidate in my book. He gave big kudos to Ohtaki when he emphasized the need to prioritize issues and focus on them.

5) Cline & Robinson, aka Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, couldn't really name any achievements "their" Councils could be proud of. In fact, Robinson admitted that Cline's Council would have to "take credit" for the success of previous Councils, such as the development of the Rosewood Hotel. Wow! I guess, that goes to show you they really didn't do much in four years. Measure T is on the ballot, but Mr. Bohannon's project is still not done!


Posted by Outside Looking In, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 30, 2010 at 12:46 am

2 of 2 posts

Empty promises by the incumbents--

Four years ago, one of Cline's priorities was to "end slate politics" and to "restore honest and open government": Web Link. Looking back on the last four years, 2/3 of Cline's priorities were not done. He has engaged in "slate politics" to the max-- just look at all the 4-1 and 3-2 votes over the last four years!

As for open and honest government... remember the time Cline violated the Brown by calling an illegal, closed, and unnoticed meeting of the Peninsula Cities Consortium (PCC) with the CA High Speed Rail Authority as noted in early July. This Brown Act violation is a result two possible situations: 1) Cline knowing violated the Brown and thought it would be easier to ask for forgiveness than ask for permission, and/or 2) Cline did not understand the Brown Act, although I'm sure he, like all elected officials, received Brown Act training. Whatever the scenario is, Cline is unqualified to be on the Council and certainly does NOT deserve another four years!

Where does one begin with Robinson? Besides serious anger management issues, I don't know what other thing he's been known for during his time on the Council, except believing that he would actually be elected to a regional seat on the MTC. HA! He lost because he reputation on a regional level is horrible. He is viewed by council lmembers of other City Councils as a crazy person!

However, let's get down to his priorities from 2006… he wanted to "invigorate Menlo Park's economy." (Web Link) Taking credit for another Council's work does not fulfill this priority! Besides endorsing Measure T, what exactly has he done to "invigorate Menlo Park's economy?" Under "Mayor Robinson," Sun Microsystems/Oracle left Menlo Park. To not know about this and then be reactive because of burdensome regulations is not "invigorating Menlo Park's economy." The list goes on and on.

Peter Ohtaki is the only candidate with financial expertise and experience in balancing a government budget. He is also the only candidate who is qualified and trained to put together a real disaster preparedness plan and deal with disasters.

Bottom line… vote for Ohtaki and Bernstein. Don't know who #3 is, but it probably shouldn't be anyone who is line with Kelly Fergusson, otherwise, you will have more dysfuncationality on the Council. Perhaps, voters should write-in their own names-- anyone would be better than the incumbents, for sure!


Posted by right picks wrong order, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 30, 2010 at 12:36 pm

Chuck Bernstein was the clear winner to me. He had command of all topics. His financial and business experience tops Ohtaki's who was 2nd place. Chuck's experience with city issues is much more broad and deep. He has evidence that he gets things done.
He calls a spade a spade, and prompts others to think more creatively. Having worked with him off and on for many years, I know what a good person and leader he is. I respect and admire Chuck's involvement in boy scouts, youth sports, and dedication to helping the development of healthy and happy children (his own schools and Menlo Park's schools).


Posted by old timer, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 30, 2010 at 12:46 pm

I also found Bernstein to be the clear winner. He understands all the issues, sounds like a leader and certainly has the credentials.

Russ shows up in shorts, doesn't really seem to be a serious candidate. I also it would be a shame to lose his anti-HSR knowledge and leadership.




Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields