Hanretty released from prison, appeals court order for $2.7M in restitution | December 11, 2013 | Almanac | Almanac Online |


News - December 11, 2013

Hanretty released from prison, appeals court order for $2.7M in restitution

by Barbara Wood

Tim Hanretty, the former Woodside and Portola Valley school official who was imprisoned for embezzlement and misappropriating public funds in 2012, has been released after serving a year of his two-year sentence and has taken steps to appeal a court order to repay $2.67 million to the Woodside Elementary School District.

This story contains 559 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


Posted by John, a resident of another community
on Dec 11, 2013 at 9:36 pm

Mr Hanretty has a long history of stealing monies from non profit organizations and his most recent positions in school districts. Those aware of his prior actions were vindicated that he was finally caught. He should NEVER be trusted around money as he certainly knows how to "play the part." It is unfortunate he was released after serving one year; given the light sentence he received.

Posted by Wait a sec, a resident of Atherton: other
on Dec 11, 2013 at 10:27 pm

My reading of these articles found:

1. Mr. Hanretty apparently had $101,000 of home-related solar work reimbursed by the school district. This is stealing, and he definitely needs to pay it back.

2. Mr. Hanretty spent $2.6M of school district loan money on school district projects he presumably thought were important but were not authorized. It's hard for me to call this theft, since he didn't steal the money for himself. Certainly a misguided public servant who thought the ends justified the means, and who thought he knew better. I would agree this is misappropriation of public funds.

Should he have to pay the entire $2.6M back? That's a bit fuzzy. If it was spent on things the school absolutely didn't need, and currently has no use of or benefit from, then there is a very persuasive argument that he should. But what if the school is benefiting from at least some of this? I'm not sure repayment of the entire amount is fair in this case. What would make sense to me is getting an independent auditor or citizen group to figure that issue out to see if there can be some middle ground.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields