The petitioners asked the district to prepare a full environmental impact report detailing the effects that the proposed expansion will have on the neighbors. "The filing of a Negative Declaration [stating that a full EIR is not required] would not take into account our concerns and would be legally insufficient," the petition says.
Among the key concerns of the neighbors:
• Traffic congestion and related safety issues for students — as well as motorists and pedestrians in the vicinity — particularly at the beginning and end of the school day, and during evening school functions.
• Parking on surrounding streets, including Elder Avenue and Politzer and Hillview drives.
• Transportation of students to and from school.
The plan to eliminate the Tinker Park tot lot and the adjacent tennis courts at Hillview, which were used by the public.
• Environmental issues relating to demolition and construction.
"We want the best for our schools, too," said neighbor Mike Armstrong, who presented the petition to the board. "We want our concerns as neighbors to be considered."
Board President Terry Thygesen told the Almanac: "Clearly, once a general approach has been selected for Hillview, the district will begin an environmental analysis of the project. Based on the environmental analysis, the district will determine what type of CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) analysis is most appropriate."
"The district has every intention of being a good neighbor and working in a constructive way to address neighborhood concerns," she said.
This story contains 309 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.