The council sent a letter to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) in December asking for the exemption, and the agency has 60 days to respond to the request. The letter requested that CalPERS allow Mr. Danielson to work up to 960 more hours over the course of the next 12 months, if necessary, and still receive his pension.
The exemption is needed, the letter states, to allow Mr. Danielson to finish "a reformation of the Town's operations in a way that will hopefully lead us from the brink of financial catastrophe. ... It would be a substantial blow to this work in progress if he were forced to leave at the present time."
Mayor Widmer said that, once the council has heard from CalPERS, "we may write a new contract for a specified period of time while we're deciding what to do as far as a search (for a permanent town manager), or we may have a month-to-month (contract)."
One of Mr. Danielson's key tasks as interim town manager was to find a permanent manager. After being named to the interim position, he told the Almanac that his "target time" to complete that task was "somewhere within six months." But before that happens, he said, "I'm hoping we can take care of some of the more difficult things so that when the city manager is hired, we have some things in place."
He was alluding to another critical job the council directed him to accomplish during his tenure: fix the structural budgetary deficit that threatened to leave the town nearly $900,000 in the red that year.
"We have to address the (town's) fiscal shortfall — there's not the luxury of waiting," he said at the time. "We'll be looking for efficiencies," considering options that include contracting out some services, Mr. Danielson said.
Much of Mr. Danielson's year on the job involved restructuring how the town operates, with the layoff of 13 of the town's 16 general employees and the outsourcing of the building and public works departments.
Mr. Danielson did not return the Almanac's phone calls seeking comment, and it is unknown whether he will return his salary from the town, or not receive his pension for the period he was paid, if CalPERS rejects the town's appeal for an exemption to the pension restriction.
This story contains 495 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.