http://almanacnews.com/print/story/print/2012/09/12/funds-rejected-by-san-mateo-county-may-pay-for-new-trail-network


Almanac

News - September 12, 2012

Funds rejected by San Mateo County may pay for new trail network

by Gennady Sheyner

An eleventh-hour request from Palo Alto and Stanford University for a grant that would greatly accelerate the city's ambitious bike plan and create an expansive trail network around the Stanford Dish glided past the City Council on Tuesday night, Sept. 4, and now heads to the Santa Clara County for approval.

The proposal, which the city and the university scrambled to put together over the past month, aims to tap into a $10.4 million pool that the county received from Stanford after San Mateo County decided not to use the funds to build a new trail at Alpine Road. The trail was one of two proposed as a mitigation for Stanford's "general use permit," which allowed the university to construct up to 5 million square feet of new development on campus.

When San Mateo County declined to use the Stanford funds for the new trail, the money reverted to Santa Clara County, which now must use the money to enhance recreation opportunities for users of the Stanford campus.

The grant application that the two sides plan to submit requests funds for five projects — $4 million for the proposed bike bridge at Adobe Creek; $4.5 million for new trails between El Camino Real and the Stanford Dish and along Junipero Serra; $200,000 to create the city's second "bike boulevard" at Park Boulevard; $1.5 million for a new bike-and-pedestrian trail along Matadero Creek, which would link Bryant Street and Greer Road; and $200,000 to enhance a trail along the Arastradero Road, between Foothill Expressway and Purissima Road in Los Altos Hills.

The proposal was quickly put together by city staff and Stanford officials after initial disagreements about how the funds should be spent. City planners acknowledged Sept. 4 that they have much work to do when it comes to public outreach. But given the tight deadline — the application was due Sept. 6 — they urged the council to support the ambitious proposal. Two of the projects in the proposal — the bike bridge at Adobe Creek and the Park Boulevard — are key components of the city's recently adopted Bike and Pedestrian Transportation Plan, a document that aims to transform Palo Alto into one of the nation's premier biking destination.

"We think this is a great opportunity for the city to hopefully kick-start our newly adopted Bike and Pedestrian Transportation Plan and to really significantly fund two of our major priorities," Planning Director Curtis Williams said.

The council agreed and voted 6-0, with Councilman Sid Espinosa absent and Mayor Yiaway Yeh and Councilman Larry Klein recusing themselves, to support the application.

The joint proposal earned plaudits from an important stakeholder group — Stanford campus residents. Allyn Taylor, vice president of the Stanford Campus Residential Leaseholders, said her group (which is elected to represent the campus community) fully backs the joint application from the city and the university.

The campus residents hadn't always seen eye to eye with the city on the recreation funds. When Santa Clara County Supervisor Liz Kniss proposed in May to use the Stanford funds to pay for Palo Alto's bike bridge and to spend another $3 million to extend the Dumbarton link to the Bay Trail, campus residents protested that the two projects are too distant from the campus. They asked the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors to delay its vote and to consider other projects, including the campus residents' proposal to extend trails around the Dish.

University officials, who concurred that the process was moving too fast, asked the county supervisors to set up a more deliberative process for evaluating various grant requests. The Board of Supervisors agreed and is now scheduled to hold a public hearing on the grant proposals on Oct. 9.

The county issued its request for proposals in August, said Jaime Rodriguez, Palo Alto's chief transportation official. This left the city and Stanford with less than a month to put together a grant application.

The new plan differs markedly from the one Ms. Kniss pitched in May. The new grant proposal includes a wider range of bike projects than the previous one. It also includes the network of trails by the Dish that Stanford campus residents have long lobbied for. It doesn't, however, ask for any funds for the 27-mile Dumbarton link in the San Francisco Bay Trail, between Redwood City and Alviso.

Mr. Williams, Palo Alto's planning director, said the city decided not to pursue the Dumbarton link because that project would lie in San Mateo County, well outside the city's jurisdiction. "The application needs to come from the sponsoring agency, and we're not that for the Bay Trail," he said, "It's not a project that we would sponsor and build."

Even so, the Bay Trail project could compete with the ones proposed by Palo Alto and Stanford. Adina Levin, co-chair of the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, said the Midpeninsula Open Space District plans to submit its own application for that plan. The project, she said, would add value to the Palo Alto sections of the Bay Trail by making it possible for people to get from the city to San Mateo and Alameda counties.

But Palo Alto council members agreed that the city would have a better shot at getting county funds with the proposal offered by staff and Stanford. Mr. Rodriguez, Palo Alto's chief transportation official, noted that the Dumbarton trail is located too far from the other elements in the proposal. The ones included, on the other hand, all link together in one cohesive network. The argument proved convincing to the council.

Comments

Posted by Broken Pavement, a resident of Portola Valley: Ladera
on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:09 pm

Good work on Palo Alto's part quickly seizing on this opportunity. Meanwhile San Mateo County lives on with a segment of 'trail' along Alpine Road that most reasonable people find unacceptable and un-passable. As the Alpine 'trail' slides into the creek, the possibility of What Could Have Been hopefully will weigh heavily on the dissenting members of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors who in their imminent wisdom turned down these same $10.4M in funds to repair a section of this trail. We should all never underestimate the power of a small band of motivated zealots to undermine a logical decision that otherwise would have been made. I still find it hard to believe that in these fiscal times that any government agency turned down monies to improve infrastructure. Disgusting, really.