Interestingly, however, both Stanford's Steve Elliott and city staff cited the Stanford project's "fit" with the Grand Boulevard Initiative as a "benefit." Really?
Consider, if the GBI folks really wanted to improve Peninsula transit, they'd be focusing on our east-west connectivity. After all, in addition to Caltrain, we have buses running north/south on El Camino.
But this plan is not primarily about transportation, it is about changing our lives, both by urbanizing our suburbs, and by making driving practically unfeasible. Otherwise, why is the plan also espousing high-density zoning for one quarter mile on either side of El Camino?
Here's a quote from the GBI Principles: "Amend General Plans and implement zoning and Specific Plans that facilitate increases in density, particularly around transit stations and key intersections." In GBI logic, more people crammed into tight spaces near bus routes means more riders. So, instead of the buses serving the needs of the community, the community is being reconfigured to serve the needs of the buses!
That is, of VTA and SamTrans under the umbrella of the GBI, partnering with the usual suspects: special interests, developers, and bureaucrats who relish the opportunity to foist their pipe-dreams on an unsuspecting public. Peninsula cities have representatives at the GBI table. Mayor Ohtaki represents Menlo Park on the GBI Task Force. Maybe it is time to tell him what you think of the plan. Otherwise, get ready to queue up and wait for the bus.
Cherie Zaslawsky, Menlo Park downtown
This story contains 322 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.