However, my joy was short-lived, when, within weeks of its opening, the entire field and track were removed and trenching for new pipes began. I queried some of the contractors' personnel and was told they had to install new pipe to resolve some drainage issues.
It is clear that this project was ill-managed and lacked critical supervision and inspections as the work proceeded. For a construction management company to charge an additional $50,000 for ineffective oversight is unconscionable and should be addressed. Worse yet, the school district's own facility director, Ahmad Sheikholeslami, when asked by the Almanac "why the firm should be paid additional money when the original work it oversaw was found to be seriously flawed," is quoted as saying: "With projects of this nature, you can't always catch every little thing."
"Every little thing?" If the school district's representative has such low expectations of what constitutes good oversight, it's no wonder this happened.
Contrary to Mr. Sheikholeslami's assessment, this debacle is not a "little thing." Thousands of taxpayer dollars are needlessly being spent, kids have been and will be deprived of the use this facility, city after-school programs have been impacted, and massive overtime wages are being incurred. Even if the district is ultimately reimbursed, it still begs the question: "Why wasn't it done right the first time?"
This story contains 292 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.