A $265 million measure would raise taxes by about $16 per $100,000 of a property's assessed value. With interest payments included, the cost to the taxpayer typically doubles.
Studies show wide support for a measure of up to $300 million among 800 likely voters, but also show that a campaign will be necessary. But how long a campaign?
A short campaign for a June election would make funds available to meet enrollment in 2016-17, about when the surge will start, but a short campaign also makes big demands on volunteers. They must quickly devise a strategy, arrange endorsements, set up and staff phone banks, and advertise. Professional help is available, but at a cost. Will donors step forward in time, in sufficient numbers, and with sufficient contributions?
A November election gives ample time for all this, but voter turnout will be higher — not usually desirable when asking for a tax increase — and competing finance measures may complicate things.
This story contains 238 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.