The 5-0 vote on May 6 came with a caveat: The city intends to look around to see whether other contractors, such as the Palo Alto Humane Society, could provide the same services for less.
"It would've been better if you'd brought us into this process a lot earlier," Mayor Ray Mueller commented, addressing project representatives at the meeting. "You probably would've had an easier time with this council."
Mr. Mueller said an earlier request could have led the city to help find private donors, for example. During the meeting, project representatives said private funding wasn't explored given the lack of public relations appeal of a facility that will house dangerous and sick animals.
Vice Mayor Cat Carlton said she was aware of at least one private organization that funds this type of project.
San Mateo County plans to replace a 60-year-old animal-holding facility on Airport Boulevard in San Mateo with a new, smaller one estimated to cost between $15.1 million and $20.2 million. The county contracts with the Peninsula Humane Society for facility operations, and in turn the 20 cities and towns contract for services.
The county asked the cities and towns that use the services to contribute toward the cost of the new facility.
Menlo Park was the last of 20 Peninsula jurisdictions to reach a decision; the others have approved the funding. Under the agreement, Menlo Park will pay $23,728 to $31,769 annually. Woodside, Portola Valley and Atherton will pay $3,000 to $13,111 annually.
Should Menlo Park abandon the contract, there is no financial penalty, but the city must give one year's notice, according to project representatives. Those cities remaining under contract would pick up the extra cost.