Town Square

Post a New Topic

Office project: Neighbors raise traffic fears

Original post made on Jan 9, 2008

Neighbors' concerns about traffic hazards near a proposed medical office complex in Menlo Park will be discussed at the City Council's meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 8.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, January 9, 2008, 12:00 AM

Comments (2)

Posted by Chris, a resident of Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
on Jan 9, 2008 at 5:17 pm

So why is the idea of a traffic light at this intersection not being seriously considered? Is it because of the cost? It seems to me the cost of not having good traffic control there is much too high. Didn't that woman whose car was hit in July die of her injuries?


Posted by Martin Engel, a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Jan 10, 2008 at 8:25 am

Rory Brown has it right. No matter what we want on that intersection, even a dancing cop who directs traffic, it won't matter. From Encinal north, it's Atherton's jurisdiction, not ours.

The problem is actually bigger. As even the village idiot can tell you, traffic is increasing on El Camino. It's a state road and Caltrans regulates it. Their philosophy is to resist any restrictions, such as signaling. They want to maximize "through-put," to use a Valley term. That means no signs or lights unless the intersection becomes a documented war zone. Several conversations with their traffic engineer bore that out.

Furthermore, Atherton also has a philosophy, and their police department has indicated that they want no traffic mitigation signage on ECR.

Whatever is built on the Acorn lot, it will doubtlessly involve cars. Although related, vehicle flow into and out of the 1906 and 1706 properties and their projected inadequate parking are minor issues vis--vis the larger problems of ECR traffic.

We can only hope that the ECR Visioning effort, if and when it ever gets completed, will incorporate a very hard look at traffic – and parking -- the entire 8500 ft. of Menlo Park. My fear is that as ECR frontage projects get approved, one after the other, the "Vision" and any traffic management plan will have been already decided "on the ground."


I've said this often before. We really need to get together with Atherton for what my wife calls a "shared mental model" and collective decision-making. There should be a (Brown Act) joint standing transportation, traffic and rail committee with council member and city staff representation. Are you listening, Mr. Mayor?


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Services, Dining and Shopping Downtown in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 16 comments | 2,193 views

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,916 views

What is the new couple's paradigm these days?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,133 views

A Street Fair by Any Other Name
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 546 views

Separate Entrances for BMR and Market Rate Apartments?
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 295 views