Town Square

Post a New Topic

Fiscal Responsibility Can't Be A Minority Thing

Original post made by Henry Riggs on Nov 1, 2008

Editor,

Last Tuesday, a lone Menlo Park councilman questioned whether our city was in a position to grant bonus pay to about a hundred temporary Union workers who just got a (small) raise. The point was not whether another $25,000/year commitment is a budget breaker (Heyward Robinson called that amount "inconsequential") but whether it's consistent with a city facing imminent new commitments at the same time as a shrinking income. That seemed pretty real, but no other council member thought fiscal restraint was due Tuesday.

What's troubling is that anyone in business knows we're in for a couple of very tough years for local government. In Menlo, we will lose additional business license, permit fees and sales tax income; the state will take part of our Redevelopment Reserves; we will likely again prop up the employee retirement system due to huge losses by CALPERS; and we haven't funded phase II of our critical El Camino/Downtown Vision. Meanwhile our current budget already projects a $1 million deficit.

So, if you knew your family income would start stepping down next month, and the furnace broke down, would you still be charging as casually on the credit card?

We need more than one lonely voice speaking honestly to what's coming. By next year - in a recession - this council will vote 4:1 to boost the UUT, burdening business as well as resident, over controlling expenses. Respectfully, we need a new voice with some solid business experience on council, and we need it soon.

Henry Riggs
Callie Lane

Comments (2)

Posted by Ron Shepherd, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Nov 1, 2008 at 11:05 am

What kind of a message do you send staff by indicating $25,000 is inconsequential? The city should be edelivering services we need on a long-term, cost-effective basis. Saving $25,000 wherever you can is very important.


Posted by are you a psychic?, a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Nov 1, 2008 at 11:22 am

Pray tell, how do you know that 4 of the current council WILL raise the UUT? Do you remember that Andy Cohen voted against it in the first place and, once it was approved, voted for lowering it to the current rate?
Yes, there are bigger issues at stake and some tough issues ahead. I'm glad that we have a council with some experience with the city's finances to wrestle with tough choices, and I'm glad that they believe in involving the community to help set priorities.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,300 views

Breastfeeding Tips
By Jessica T | 4 comments | 804 views

Weekly Update
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 715 views

Pension Contribution Changes To Have A Multi-Million Dollar Impact To Menlo Park School District
By Erin Glanville | 7 comments | 641 views

Separate Entrances for BMR and Market Rate Apartments?
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 393 views