Town Square

Post a New Topic

Guest opinion: A Palo Alto take on high speed rail

Original post made on Feb 10, 2009

Last November voters passed Proposition 1A and swept in a new transportation vision for California — one that will see a high-speed rail line as the spine that will connect the key cities and regions of our state.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 12:00 AM

Comments (1)

Posted by Martin Engel, a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Feb 10, 2009 at 2:58 pm

First of all, Councilwoman Kishimoto is to be commended for her very thoughtful Guest Opinion piece. Furthermore, she is to be congratulated for assuming responsibility for bringing various towns on the Peninsula together into an ad hoc coalition. That process is currently under way and it promises to have us all speak with one voice to the rail authority about many of the issues that Ms. Kishimoto raises in her article. I hope that this process gets formalized and that documents are issued with the signatures of representatives from as many cities as possible along the rail corridor.

We are well past the point of debating the merits of the proposed rail system for California. The Palo Alto city council expressed its unanimous support prior to last November's elections, while Menlo Park issued a statement of opposition. I share the position of Menlo Park and support Menlo Park's participation in the CEQA lawsuit against the high-speed rail authority.

So, this is where we are. The lawsuit will be brought before the court in May. We need to win it. It gives Atherton and Menlo Park leverage.
Whether we win or lose, however, we must also make plans to protect our cities, especially Atherton, Menlo Park and Palo Alto, from the devastating impact of elevated train corridors with four tracks.

One alternative, already seriously considered by our three cities, is tunneling beneath the current rail corridor. That warrants a great deal of analysis and is a promising option inasmuch as it eliminates all the disruptive consequences that an elevated train would produce. No eminent domain adverse takings. No temporary shoofly tracks for
Caltrain. No business disruptions downtown. No property value depreciation. To the contrary! The air rights could well be deployed for limited development and revenue production.

Therefore, in order to make our collective voices heard, the multi-city coalition will be a powerful vehicle that can negotiate successfully to secure the needs for each of our cities regarding the development of the rail corridor.

Thanks to the Council members of Atherton, Menlo Park and Palo Alto for taking the initiative on this important issue.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The dress code
By Jessica T | 21 comments | 1,914 views

September food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,326 views

. . . People will never forget how you made them feel.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,264 views

College Freshmen: Avoiding the Pitfalls
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,140 views

Council election, and then some.
By Stuart Soffer | 5 comments | 467 views