Town Square

Post a New Topic

Tuesday: Public hearing on Bohannon project

Original post made on May 24, 2010

The "Menlo Gateway" office/hotel project proposed by the Bohannon Development Co. will be the sole topic of discussion at a public hearing Tuesday, May 25. The meeting starts at 7 p.m. in the council chambers.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, May 24, 2010, 11:28 AM

Comments (17)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by concerned
a resident of Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
on May 24, 2010 at 7:41 pm

So what does "public benefit" REALLY mean ? Where is the Fire Department's needs in all of this ? Does it come under "public benefit" or they going to be left to "fend for themselves" after
nothing is left from any revenues. The developer seems to think that
there are other fire departments around, just like there are other
places to build, if menlo park botches things up. It will be interesting to see what give aways and what take backs happen at the meeting. Show up people, voice your yay or nay.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lloyden Park
on May 24, 2010 at 7:55 pm

The City of Menlo Park has greedily negotiated the best possible terms for its own narrow interests and basically told the Fire District that it is on its own to negotiate with Bohannon.

The impact of this project on the Fire District is huge and if there are no other arrangements then the Fire District will have to shift resources from downtown Menlo Park and the residential areas to provide fire protection for this project.

This is a telling illustration of how poorly the City has handled the impact review of this project.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dharma
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on May 24, 2010 at 7:59 pm

The city of Menlo Park has a general fund budget of about $36 million per year for all staff (including police) and every discretionary program.
Menlo Park Fire Prevention District has a budget of $30 million per year $100,000 per year (minimum) firemen to be "ready" for local fires in Menlo and the three adjacent small towns.
Your concern is what?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 24, 2010 at 8:16 pm

Dharma asks:"Your concern is what?"

Simply that the very large burden created by this project's high density and high buildings be mediated by appropriate staffing and equipment to provide the project with adequate fire and safety protection WITHOUT drawing down existing resources that currently protect other areas of Menlo Park.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 24, 2010 at 8:21 pm

Peter Carpenter is a registered user.

Do you want the Fire District's only high ladder truck moved from the centrally located Middlefield Station to this project thereby leaving the rest of Menlo Park without that coverage?

Should not Bohannon provide for a second ladder truck to cover his high rise buildings?

This is the kind of impact and mitigation which was totally ignored by the City of Menlo Park because, guess what, they don't have a fire department so it is not their problem.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 24, 2010 at 9:57 pm

Let's just take our time on this until the public feelings are known after the November elections. Let the new council decide.

Personally, I don't think any new or current council member who approves/supports this project as pushed through by an aggressive city staff will win be elected/reelected.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned Citizen
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 25, 2010 at 8:19 am

If Menlo Park had its own municipal fire dept, I wonder if they would
be as concerned ? You betcha they would, then the onas would be on
them for safety and responsibility and they couldn't pass the buck.
But instead, they let another agency fight for their position. The city over the years have demonstrated that they are not a "TEAM" player where public matters.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by James
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on May 25, 2010 at 9:49 am

I'll bet that somewhere in the money the City will be receiving that there is an amount for additional police services given the projected increase in traffic and people. As Concerned Citizen points out, if the Menlo Park Fire had been a Department and not an independent District, they would have been allocated funds.

I did some homework, do you know that the last time the Fire District added additional services was the construction of its station on Chilco Ave. in east Menlo Park in 1997. Dharma indicates that the Fire District has a budget on $30M. Do you know that the State takes some of that money (about $2M) for education every year? Do you know that this year the State borrowed another $1M to off-set its deficit?

Given what Mr. Bohannan is projecting in development, do you think it's reasonable that the Fire District should be allocated some funds as is common practice around the country with substantial new development?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by truth
a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on May 25, 2010 at 12:24 pm

This is such a cheap Peter Carpenter game. The fire district takes a huge amount of money from city coffers already to the tune of 15% of our property taxes. In fact, the fire district gets more property tax from the city than the city.

There is no city that provides more to the district than Menlo Park. We are the fire district's sugar daddy. And Atherton and Woodside et al get a free ride. Peter and his city are minor players but they want that service don't they? They want those homes and the police to pick up their newspapers but while millionaires gnash their teeth their city is going broke.

So now they want the sugar daddy to cough up more money.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 25, 2010 at 1:41 pm

As usual there is no truth in "Truth"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by WhoRUpeople
a resident of another community
on May 25, 2010 at 3:45 pm

I know this is off topic, and I apologize to all. But I believe Peter is reading this thread and I think he can answer my question. Peter, and I am not asking this to be rude, I really am curious as to the answer. You mention the Menlo Park Fire has a "high ladder truck". I know that MP, Atherton and EPA do not have any buildings over about 50' and I believe they all have height limits at that or below. Why did the FD buy a high latter truck? and why wouldn't it make sense to locate it closer to this new project than to downtown MP if the project does get built?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 25, 2010 at 5:20 pm

The fact is that there are a number of apartment buildings in Menlo Park and the Ikea buildng in East Palo Alto that are well over 50 ft. The Fire District has a 100 ft ladder truck for both these tall buildings and to provide overhead suppression of lower level fires - as was done in the Sharon Hills fire recently. If the Bohannon project were built that ladder truck could not respond in the required 3 minute time from its current Middlefield location.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Getting It
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 25, 2010 at 9:38 pm

I think a lot of people miss the point about fire departments. They are protecting the whole town by containing the fire. Remember the Chicago Fire, the San Francisco fire, the Oakland Hills fire. Don't ask for whom the fire bell tolls.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Roy Thiele-Sardina
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 25, 2010 at 11:03 pm

Peter

A point of correction. The ladder could not respond in the "DESIRED" 3 minute time from it's current location. There is no requirement for response, just a desired reponse time.

Out of curiosity how long is the reponse time to Ikea, and how long would it be to the Bohanon Project?

Roy


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 26, 2010 at 7:40 am

In the Fire Chief's 21 Sept 2009 letter to the City of Menlo Park he stated "Acceptable standards for urban aerial ladder truck coverage are based on a maximum distance of 2.5 miles"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on May 26, 2010 at 9:47 am

Peter:

is that 2.5 mile radius or 2.5 driven miles (not in a straight line)?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 26, 2010 at 9:58 am

Menlo voter asks:"is that 2.5 mile radius or 2.5 driven miles (not in a straight line)"

I don't know, you would have to ask the Fire Chief.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Cho's, beloved dim sum spot, to reopen in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 5,824 views

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 2,255 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,830 views

What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 22 comments | 1,010 views

Water Torture
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 394 views