Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Aug 27, 2010
I spoke at three straight City Council meetings this spring, requesting that the Council rescind its decision to refund $1.6 million of these fees, based upon a criteria which seemed much too broad. I'm gratified that was done, and that this compromise plan, devised by a small working group which included Councilmember Jerry Carlsen, Finance committee member Jeff Wise, town Staff, and me, was approved. I thank the Council for revisiting and revising this decision, as I believe it to be equitable and in the best interests of the residents of the town.
and Thankyou for that Mr. McPherson
But what conflict of interest did Charles Marsala have with P.P.G. or the Ackleys that caused him and or the city attorney to instruct, that Charles opt to recuse himself from voting on this matter?
Also why did Ms Lewis not recuse herself from voting on refunds to her own contractor?
It would be nice to save/protect the town some integrity as well as the money if possible.
Sorry to rain on your parade.
The Council took action to refund road impact fees. By doing so it made an admission that it acted illegally by approving the increase back in 2006.
The compromise plan accomplishes nothing more than subjecting the town to further litigation. While Ms Furth stands to benefit in the form of a fat year end bonus from her new employer, the Town stands to lose.
[Portion removed; personal attack.]
I did not agree with the town's original decision. Howecer this compromise plan is even more foolish.
JJ-it's hard to admit that your idea for raising revenue was I fact the source of lawsuits.
Whether you are for the road impact fee refund or not, giving Jerry Carlson any credit for it, as Mike McPherson did, is wrong. Jerry Carlson voted to give all the money back just a few months ago. The credit goes to Kathy McKeithen and Jim Dobbie for refusing to take the money out of the treasury. Carlson even voted to overturn the 4/5 council requirement for taking money out of the treasury to override their opposition. Only after public outcry started about the refund, did the chameleon Jerry Carlson change his position. When I confronted with him this at the meeting two months ago, he said he reevaluated his position after learning about Atherton's dire financial situation. The fact is, if he only learned about that a few months ago, that's a really big problem. In summary, Kathy McKeithen and Jim Dobbie are the reason that the road impact fee refund was limited. Now, I am waiting for Jim Dobbie to respond to campaign finance reform and am very disappointed he won't. But, that doesn't change the fact that he was one of the two prime movers behind this (and the only council member to steadfastly oppose any refund), NOT Jerry Carlson.
Sorry Atherton Taxpayer
You are wrong again. The road impact fee was adopted in 2000. Cliff Temps recommended it and the Council approved a year before I was hired.
One other thing you should be aware of. It was Marsala that whispered in a certain builder of spec homes ear that caused the current lawsuit.
If you want to know which developer that might be, here is a hint. Marsala's most recent recusal for "personal reasons".
Swing voter Jerry Carlson's balancing act and waivering "neutrality" are the reason for many or even most, of the missed opportunities for correction Atherton has had and lost over the last few years--especially his year as mayor--right there at the helm during the hiring of a two new city managers, new assistant, new clerk, new city attorney, new Building inspector, two Police Chiefs.....you name it and either poor selections were made or poor direction was provided. A lot of time and money but Zero progress was made.
Now it's looking like another blank slate will be presenting itself shortly--Gruber and Wilkerson are toast, Wassman needs t be replaced, NEW legal council is a must......
Jerry--I may or or may not vote for you this fall, depending on what can be determined about the newer and less known candidates running, but please, if you are voted onto the council again, would you please just do what ever McKeithen wants instead of trying to figure any thing out for your self.
I do thank Jerry for his efforts on High Speed Rail -its the one thing I believe he has been clear about and good at sticking with. This at least has been a worthwhile effort and to his credit. But he should leave the rest of the heavy lifting to others.
If Jerry Carlson only had a heart, if he only had a brain, if he only had courage......
Mr. Johns statements are, in my opinion, incorrect. The Council's action does not make "an admission that it acted illegally". A changed position is not an admission of illegality. Further, to say that the compromise plan only invites further litigation ignores the likelihood of litigation that led the Council to refund the fees in the first place. Unfortunately, no matter what action was taken, because of the judicial decision in Kern County, litigation on this subject was probable.
I generally don't like debating these issues in a forum such as this, so if anybody would like to send me an email for further discussion, my address is in the town roster.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Teavana Palo Alto closes
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 4,091 views
What Freshmen Should be Thinking About College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 17 comments | 3,278 views
Waiting on the Edge of Death
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 1,754 views
Welcome Back Sugar Addict
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,606 views
Menlo Park Playing Nicely
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 327 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 The Almanac
All rights reserved.