Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Oct 12, 2010
There are far more people against L than your article mentions.
And there is no way that $6,100 listed as being in the Yes on L kitty as of Oct 1 will still be there at the end of the campaign. The CItywide slick mailers that came out recently did not appear to be reported in the Oct 1 report. And they will have to do more mailers once the No on L starts to come out with its mailers.
No on L may have been slower out of the blocks, but it is gaining ground once people realize that the City will be on the hook for the legal costs if it passes, the City could be kicked out of CalPers which would cause additional costs, and its selective nature is disporportionately affective women and minority positions.
The Council did it the RIGHT way, and there is really no need for L at all. It's not fair and it's not smart. No on L.
Easy to say there's a lot more people, when everything's done anonymously. At least the Yes on L people are out in the open.
Just so we are clear. The city will only have to defend itself in a lawsuit if it's employees sue them. So if the employees want to bite the hand tha feeds them, we will have to defend our right to not pay them $60,000+ per year in pension.
Are you kidding me? The city already gave them $6,800,000 in 2007 when we raised their pensions by 35%.
Also, Roy Sardina clearly pointed out on another post (se link below) that the City Attorney told the city council, that we woould not be thrown out of CalPERS, since the issue could be fixed with the Yes on Measure L committees approval in a court appearance.
How is this against minority and women? the highest paid employee in Menlo Park is minority, and half of our employees are women (much higher than the US private workforce). Every NEW employee will be getting 60% of their pay as a pension (our current employees will still get 81% of their final pay as pension), as opposed to the MUCH LOWER social security they would get in the private world. How is that hardship?
[Portion removed. Please avoid attacking other posters.]
That is the link to the other thread with the comments by Roy
I've met some of the Yes on L backers, including that ex-council member who I voted against when she was ousted. Let me just say these aren't the kind of people I enjoy drinking a cup of coffee with. They have so much animosity that it seems nothing will ever make them happy or content; the core of their argument is anger-driven. This past weekend, I was visited by a volunteer for the No on L folks, who explained that L is at its core an attack on the City Council. I believe that the City Council should make these complicated decisions...and if they do something that I don't like, I'll vote them out, just like Menlo Park voters voted out Duboc and Winkler.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Teavana Palo Alto closes
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,863 views
What Freshmen Should be Thinking About College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 17 comments | 2,871 views
Sometimes the Rules Go Out the Window
By Cheryl Bac | 5 comments | 1,854 views
Waiting on the Edge of Death
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 1,263 views
Menlo Park Playing Nicely
By Paul Bendix | 0 comments | 231 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 The Almanac
All rights reserved.