Town Square

Post a New Topic

Vote No on Prop 26

Original post made by Linda C. on Oct 27, 2010

While I agree with you on the recommendation for a No vote on Prop 23, I am surprised that you have no opinion or mention of Prop 26. It is almost as bad, as it would make it virtually impossible to require that "polluters" pay for damages related to obtaining a permit. This is known as a "regulatory fee" and should still be considered as a fee rather than a tax. I would have hoped that you would recommend a No on Prop 26.

Comments

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Services, Dining and Shopping Downtown in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 16 comments | 1,955 views

Handmade truffle shop now open in downtown Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,571 views

The Last Grape
By Laura Stec | 11 comments | 1,115 views

A Street Fair by Any Other Name
By Paul Bendix | 2 comments | 472 views

Separate Entrances for BMR and Market Rate Apartments?
By Stuart Soffer | 0 comments | 177 views