Town Square

Post a New Topic

City to conduct nationwide search for manager

Original post made on Apr 27, 2011

Picking their way around legal questions surrounding when a pension reform measure must take effect, the Menlo Park City Council voted 3-2 on Tuesday night to conduct a nationwide search for the next city manager.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:22 AM

Comments (17)

Posted by What?, a resident of Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Apr 27, 2011 at 4:17 pm

Starla Jerome Robinson?

Andy, you've got to be kidding.

Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Apr 27, 2011 at 4:19 pm

The Council made a huge mistake in not hiring an outside interim manager who would be a true change agent.

Posted by Roy Thiele-Sardina, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Apr 27, 2011 at 5:52 pm


I completely agree with you, an interim manager could have been a vehicle for change.

The problem is we have at least three council people who have NEVER run a business in their lives. And quite frankly show a lack of business sense/knowledge that they should be embarrassed. So while this decision is regrettable, it is expected with the skillset (or lack thereof) that Kelly and Andy bring to the table......

Bad for Menlo Park.


Posted by truth, a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Apr 27, 2011 at 7:16 pm

The two with business experience disagree. The issues upcoming outrank the need for the "assumed" change agent.

Posted by peter carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Apr 27, 2011 at 7:24 pm

peter carpenter is a registered user.

Time will tell if the lack of an outside Interim City Manager for Menlo Park makes any difference - and we have a case control with Atherton's outside Interim Manager.

Let's see which community sees more positive change during the next 6 months.

Posted by It's Business Time, a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
on Apr 27, 2011 at 7:24 pm

Trying to follow Roy T-S's argument... How can Andy and Kelly's lack of business experience be the problem, given that they were on different sides of a 3-2 vote that was apparently only about whether to search nationally or not? Wouldn't the business-savvy Council members be on the losing end of a struggle to convince the others to go outside for the interim job?

Maybe more to the point, what's with the claim that "at least" 3 haven't run a business? By my count, Peter (former CFO of a high-tech company), Rich (founder and president of branding/BR firm), and Kirsten (runs a private law practice) all have strong claims to paying attention to the bottom line and being accountable. If you think Kirsten in particular doesn't have the 'big' business experience, maybe you can check with an architect friend of yours to see if solo practices provide a good basis for a Council job. You know, hypothetically.

Posted by member, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Apr 28, 2011 at 8:14 am

Why can't Mr. Rojas postpone his retirement for 6 months and save the city the monthly salary he'd get on top of his retirement pay? He could work off his home loan balance and be a beacon of fiscal responsibility!

Posted by start now, a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Apr 28, 2011 at 8:57 am

Why not start a search right away with the goal of getting a strong and fiscally savvy new manager. Why not avoid a potentially lame-duck interim manager, whether it be Rojas (who hasn't impressed me at all)or a newbie? The current and long-term budget issues of city are large. Get started on fixing it.
Looking internally only, just to save money, makes no cents (purposely spelled). Reviewing internal candidates must be done in the context of evaluating external candidates, too, using clear selection criteria.

Posted by Joanna, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Apr 28, 2011 at 9:58 am

I hope this council, despite Fergusson and Cline, decides to pay a reasonable salary. Lavishing a large salary, bonuses, allowances and loans does NOT work. Want proof? Look at Rojas.

It does NOT matter what other cities pay their city managers. We do not have to continue this maddening cycle. It is time to be responsible with tax payer funds. $250k (plus bonuses and loans) for a city manager is ridiculous no matter how well he/she does (in this case how poorly he does).

Posted by double dipping, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on May 4, 2011 at 4:07 am

Why is nobody not just saying what this is all about.

Double dipping. Classic case. Rojas resigns early, gets retirement checks and the City hires him as a consultant in the same job and pays him as a consultant. Great deal for Rojas. Lousy deal for the city.

Who recommended this? Glen Kramer. Kramer is retired, getting a large pension and has been hired by Rojas to be a consultant in his old position. Another double dipper.

Its the "old boys club" in Menlo Park, and our dense Council permits and encourages this.

The City under Rojas has not had a structurally balanced budget during his tenure. He keeps covering up the deficits. Take a look at what has happened to the General fund reserves during his tenure. Look at the huge increase in City workers salaries during this period, as well has the bloating of his administrative staff. (we need both a deputy and an assistant City Manager? --- we need 2 city clerks? )

Keep your eyes out for bonuses to be awarded to Rojas' favorite few. Boesch certainly took care of his buddies when he left for the County manager's job. (Dave Johnson in particular)

Unwilling to take any hard stops to reduce personal costs, it has always been bring on more revenue. Changes in Master fee schedule. Red light cameras. No push back on Garbage contract.

This administration will be looked at as the very worst. He shouldn't be left off the hook with "well council has the final say." This was Rojas' agenda.

Keeping him on as a consultant just reinforces what a weak council we have.

The public is being taken for a ride. Down in the RDA, they can't get a police station built in 10 years, yet those involved remain in power.

Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 4, 2011 at 4:49 am

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. "

And it is even worse when you are paying twice for the same thing.....

Posted by R.Gordon, a resident of another community
on May 5, 2011 at 11:59 am

Peter........while your sagacity is just adored in these areas, I think you best focus on Atherton, your home base, which appears to be headed to a gasping death by taxes.
Do not squander your talents. They could use you at home.

Posted by peter carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on May 5, 2011 at 12:02 pm

peter carpenter is a registered user.

Menlo Park would be wise to follow the Atherton model of an outside Interim City Manager who can bring a fresh and tough perspective to its structural deficits.

The Atherton Town Council showed courage and wisdom in selecting John Danielson as the Interim Town Manager. And Danielson is showing courage and wisdom in being prepared to make the drastic cuts that are necessary (and which I called for in my Dec 2008 message to local elected officials).

As usual R. Gordon is simply out of touch with reality and ignorant of the facts.

Posted by Eavesdropper, a resident of another community
on May 6, 2011 at 10:26 am

The two double dippers negotiated the higher pensions in the first place. Now they reap rewards so we can stall until replacements can be hired at lower pension.

I am with Peter...outside interference for interim could help "clean house" without on-going agenda.

Posted by truth, a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on May 6, 2011 at 2:11 pm

Guys like Henry Riggs and Ed Mortiz making claims to have the experience to say an outside temp would be cheaper and more of a change agent than hiring a new permanent CM from the outset. Ed was a pawn PR guy for products like "wood" or "aluminum" experience? Riggs is an independent architect. Um, like an artist with right angles.

Gimme a break. Rojas oversaw in four years Facebook into MP, Gateway passes, the draft specific plan, managing a balanced budget without taxes in one of the harshest economic eras of our lifetime and, now, maybe two tier police contracts. Add to that HSR and all the leadership MP has taken, and it should be easy.

Talk smack all you want folks, your resume is significantly lighter when it comes to what you have done for MP.

Respect is taught in Kindergarten. I guess you missed that lesson.

Posted by Long time Menlo man, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on May 7, 2011 at 7:51 am

If you think we're going to get the same quality person paying less $$ and fewer retirement benefits you're sadly, sadly misinformed.
Let's assume you are a city manager looking for a job and you're offered a job at Menlo and City A down the street which pays more AND provides a better retirement. Which would you pick? It's rhetorical. No answer required.

Posted by Menlo Voter, a resident of Menlo Park: other
on May 7, 2011 at 8:19 am

Long time menlo man:

your question presumes there is a "city a" down the street with better pay and benefits. I wouldn't make that assumption. Neither should you.

If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 2,697 views

Chai Brisket
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,917 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,071 views

Sometimes "I'm Sorry" Doesn't Cut It
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,070 views

Getting High in Menlo Park
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 695 views