Town Square

Post a New Topic

Menlo Park nixes T-Mobile cell tower in park

Original post made on Jun 2, 2011

You can't hear me now: Menlo Park has yanked T-Mobile's application to mount a cell phone antenna on a light pole in Nealon Park.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, June 2, 2011, 11:34 AM

Comments (9)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by scare tactucs
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jun 2, 2011 at 12:43 pm

I never cease to be astounded by the level of ignorance among the Luddites who oppose cell towers. Do any of them USE cell phones? If they want to avoid risk, they should immediately throw out their own phones! The radiation emitted by towers is harmless to those on the ground.

I am not a T-Mobile customer, but feel sorry for those who are, as it will be increasingly difficult for them to make/receive calls.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Voice of Reason
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Jun 2, 2011 at 4:29 pm

Sir, I am not a Luddite, nor do I play one on TV. I simply don't want the continued commercialization of park space that is also open space. What MP needs is guidelines for equipment in residential areas. For the record, I am a T-Mobile customer and Nealon Park area resident that has excellent coverage, so why was this tower needed in the first place? To provide coverage for Palo Alto, who needs more coverage. Do your homework before you start calling people names that simply don't apply.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by PALLBEAR
a resident of another community
on Jun 2, 2011 at 5:45 pm

There is a major campaign to reduce the use of cell phones and their popularity is declining as fast as Twitter and Facebook are growing.
The major paradox is that they defeat one another.
The newest cancer scare is to reach the ignorant and that encompasses the majority of voters and people who complain about the towers being unsightly. Total idiocy.
At the same time, reading is at its most desperate and crucial point of destroying the careers of most of our youth, that prices for usage are being considered to be raised to the sky (in these comparative times).
The problems the average person in this COUNTY worry about are so silly, they border on stupidity. Also, there is going to be a few new laws affecting the non political money holders. Those who are still not worried, are going to be by the end of next year.
That's all folks.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by MR
a resident of Atherton: other
on Jun 2, 2011 at 6:30 pm

@PALLBEARER:

Who is behind the "major campaign to reduce the use of cellphones?" Actually, most tweets are posted from cellphones, not computers, so your comment that "their popularity is declining" doesn't make sense. Most kids (primary users of Facebook) also use cellphones to post on Facebook.

I don't understand your comment: "reading is at its most desperate and crucial point of destroying the careers of most of our youth." Could you clarify?

Also, I don't understand your statement: "that prices for usage are being considered to be raised to the sky (in these comparative times)." If you are referring to cellphone charges, we pay less than we did two years ago (with more cellphones and better coverage).

Finally, one note: It's not "there is going to be a few new laws affecting the non political money holders." Proper grammar is: there ARE going to be a few new laws affecting the NON-POLITICAL money holders." What laws are you referring to?

Thanks.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by scare tactics
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jun 2, 2011 at 10:32 pm

I just looked at a picture (thanks to google maps) of Nealon, and it appears that the area is already pretty thick with utility cables. So the concerns about commercialization are both misguided and late! I don't know if Menlo Park has guidelines for utilities in residential areas, but seems as though you would not need anything new for cell towers, which are no more intrusive than anything else. And at least T-Mobile would be paying a few thousand dollars a month to the city, whereas I don't think PG&E et al pay a cent for criss-crossing public (and private!) property with their lines.

I expect that T-Mobile would not even try to install a tower at Nealon if it did not see a need for coverage in that area. Installing and maintaining a cell tower is expensive! I don't doubt that they will be able to find another home for the tower, maybe atop Safeway or another nearby building. With all the development being planned in Menlo Park, more towers are inevitable. We're not all going to stop using our cell phones!

P.S. I am not a "sir"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by RobertWilliams
a resident of another community
on Jun 3, 2011 at 7:01 pm

1. WIRELESS SMART METERS – 100 TIMES MORE RADIATION THAN CELL PHONES.
Video Interview: Nuclear Scientist, Daniel Hirsch, (5 minutes: 38 seconds).
Web Link

2. WIRELESS SMART METERS – CANCER, NERVOUS SYSTEM DAMAGE, ADVERSE REPRODUCTION AFFECTS.
Video Interview: Dr. Carpenter, New York Public Health Department, Dean of Public Health, (2 minutes: 23 seconds).
Web Link

3. THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM (the University that gives the Nobel Prizes) ISSUES GLOBAL HEALTH WARNING AGAINST WIRELESS SMART METERS.
2-page Press Release:
Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by PALLBEAR
a resident of another community
on Jun 4, 2011 at 9:16 am

To "MR"

ILLITERACY.
Even in our gilded area.
It is worse than the year the book "WHY JOHNNY CAN'T READ".
Read data of the amount of children who are grades behind....maybe not in YOUR kid's schools.
Do you know that the amount of foreign students comprise over 70% of the student body? Or more.
You can get your kid in an Eastern college still by buying the football team uniforms. THAT is still done.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by PALLBEAR
a resident of another community
on Jun 4, 2011 at 9:18 am

"MR"
Make that enrollment STANFORD'S....
I should not have been holding a cell phone with one hand.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by interested observer
a resident of Portola Valley: Ladera
on Jun 4, 2011 at 9:34 am

watched the web links on smart meters. Interesting. Would like to see your newspaper publish an article on the total exposure of a family to RF radiation from all common sources, i.e. microwave ovens, wi-fi, cell phones, smart meters etc. One would think in the middle of one of the most concentrated areas of scientific expertise this data is all available. If not on google then Stanford, EPRI etc. etc.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 4 comments | 1,560 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,201 views

Standardized Test Prep: When to Start and Whom to Hire?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 896 views

Finger Food and a Blood Lite?
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 747 views

Where the Sidewalk Ends
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 401 views