Town Square

Post a New Topic

Menlo Park Draft EIR Fails to Comply with California Environmental Quality Act

Original post made by interesting, Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park, on Jun 16, 2011

Here is a copy of a news release attacking the lousy, ridiculous, $1.5 million down a rathole, proposed Menlo Park specific Plan. Heavily criticized for having gotten completely out of control, and driven by City Staff and the consultant, it continues on its way. Now a real legal challenge has been issued. Hopefully many heads will roll once this outlandish plan has finally been put where the sun doesn't shine.

( My comments not those of the preservemenlopark organization.)

----------------
For Immediate Release

June 16, 2011

Menlo Park Draft EIR Fails to Comply with California Environmental Quality Act

The Menlo Park Downtown Alliance, a group of downtown business and property owners, has asked Shute, Mihaly, and Weinberger, a highly-respected law firm specializing in government, land use, natural resources and environmental law, to analyze the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) recently published by the City of Menlo Park. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City's proposed Specific Plan for Camino and Downtown triggers the need for this DEIR. After reviewing the DEIR, the firm has issued a detailed analysis that concludes that the document is deficient in a number of areas.

In particular, the DEIR violates CEQA:

∑ by failing to provide an accurate project description that accounts for all of the development that could be approved under the Specific Plan

∑ by failing to provide specific project level review for the City's short-term public projects (sidewalk widening, pocket parks, paseo, central plaza, parking garage)

∑ by failing to sufficiently analyze the impacts to historical, biological, and air resources

∑ by failing to consider the potential for urban decay

∑ by failing to properly analyze the impacts on water supply

∑ by failing to consider transportation and air quality impacts during the construction period

∑ by failing to consider a reasonable range of alternatives, including an alternative that would reduce the project's significant impacts on air quality, greenhouse gasses, and traffic

and because it relies on mitigation measures that are not certain to occur.

Downtown business and property owners have long argued that the City's Plan will have detrimental impacts on the downtown and community as a whole. "The proposed downtown portion of the Specific Plan will create a congested downtown, a more city-like atmosphere, rather than the small-town atmosphere now enjoyed by our residents," said Mark Flegel, a downtown business owner and co-chair of the Menlo Park Downtown Alliance. "I fail to see the benefits of high-density build-out either for businesses or residents," he added.

The DEIR itself concludes that the cumulative impact along with development of the Plan area would adversely affect operation of local intersections, local roadway segments. It finds further that there would be "significant and unavoidable" negative environmental impacts on air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise levels, traffic circulation and congestion.

"There is no doubt that our many small and unique businesses downtown will suffer and many will leave if this Plan is implemented. One only has to look at other nearby cities and towns (e.g. Redwood City and Sunnyvale) to see the results of this kind of misguided city planning," said Nancy Couperus, a downtown property owner and a founder of the Sunday Farmers Market.

The comment letter, which was commissioned by the Menlo Park Downtown Alliance, enumerates in detail the ways in which the DEIR violates CEQA's mandate to consider a project's potential impacts on the environment. In a number of cases it calls on the City to provide a full and proper analysis, and to revise and mitigate the environmental impacts.

To read the entire DEIR Comment Letter from Shute, Mihaly, and Weinberger, click on the following website:
Web Link


Comments (1)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ernest Goitein
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Jun 19, 2011 at 1:00 pm

Our family does much of our shopping in Menlo Park, including the Farmer's Market. Pete's Coffee, Trader Joe, Left Bank and other restaurants and shops. The proposed changes to the downtown area are poorly thought through. Why destroy the ambience that makes Menlo Park so inviting? Why would the planners discourage people from shopping in Menlo Park and instead patronize Redwood City establishments? The increased traffic is already class F during rush hour would only become that way for most of the day.

If it isn't broke, why fix it? Is somebody wanting to make big bucks and destroy our neighborhood? Once destroyed it cannot be fixed. Let's use some common sense and leave well enough alone.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Sneak peek: Bradley's Fine Diner in Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,313 views

Marriage Underachievers
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,631 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,524 views

Best High Dives to Watch the Game
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,186 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 32 comments | 989 views