Town Square

Post a New Topic

Fire board: 'Huge shift' in compensation policy?

Original post made on Jul 17, 2011

Are firefighters overpaid? In negotiating pay packages, should fire districts consider only what other fire departments are paying, or the pay and employment levels in the general economy as well?

Read the full story here Web Link posted Sunday, July 17, 2011, 7:32 PM

Comments (11)

Posted by Joseph E. Davis, a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jul 17, 2011 at 11:03 pm

What they should consider is the interest of the average citizen. That is, the compensation should be as little as possible commensurate with attracting qualified applicants.

So set a low wage and only bump it up if you can't hire qualified people. No need to look at other fire departments, survey the community, etc.

I anticipate that if the FD offered minimum wage the line would still be out the block.


Posted by Roy Desoto, a resident of another community
on Jul 18, 2011 at 6:19 am

Joseph E. Davis is correct. State Prison inmates often work on fire crews as part of their sentence. That would make convicted felons "qualified candidates" (by virtue of their training and work experience). They would gladly work for minimum wage. The principles do not define the minimum qualifications.

The principles will drive the agency toward mediocrity, by establishing a bunch of rules which hamstring the agency employees -- specifically around the hiring of new firefighters.

The Board needs to look at itself in the mirror. They need to ask why are they enacting these principles to tighten compensation and entitlements when they take them too. The Board members are entitled to participate in the union's cushy medical plan! The MPFPD foots the bill. And, that's on top of the other perks which include badges, scanner installation, and turnout gear. Giving starts at home.

The real problem is the Fire District, over time, has expanded its mission to use all of the funds they get through property taxes. It's a big slice of the pie. They get over $30 million each year to operate a FD for Atherton, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, and pockets of unincorporated area. They get 17% of the pie and their community governments get roughly 10%.

The more useful set of principles would be ones which define the MPFPD's mission in a way which allows them to use less than the $30 million they receive. Though, given public sentiment, it's more fashionable to bash the firefighters.


Posted by Poster , a resident of another community
on Jul 18, 2011 at 7:32 am

There is another thread on this topic: Web Link


Posted by Adam Smith, a resident of another community
on Jul 18, 2011 at 12:10 pm

I think the min wage comment was non-sequitur. You would not get lines around the block. The point is that hundreds apply for an FD opening, so clearly compensation could be reduced such that you get 5 qualified applicants per opening. It is not a vacuum such that either side can unilaterally set pay rates.


Posted by Steve, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jul 18, 2011 at 12:44 pm

Is this what a "race to the bottom" looks like?


Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jul 18, 2011 at 12:49 pm

This is neither a race to the top or a race to the bottom, but a move towards a rational compensation policy which reflects the economic realities of the communities which the Fire District serves and which respects the taxpayers who support the Fire District.


Posted by Joanna, a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Jul 18, 2011 at 2:29 pm

They make too much.


Posted by W Patterson, a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Jul 18, 2011 at 5:46 pm

The politics regarding the employment of fire fighters is profound.
Perhaps one should look towards THOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY on the Beltramo property where this is a fire fighter run and owned business. This company uses the fire fighting symbol in their signage. Where does this all end. Surely the public is so tired of being screwed by the fire district. They wave the flag, show pictures of their captain,s head through the top of the roof of a house, beat the drums how important and brave they are. A Captain in the Army confronting combat on a daily basis does not come close to the third year fire fighter in compensation and retirment. Scary enough. Try fighter pilots who spend four years in college, a minimum of two years in flight training, and years of continuous training, does not come close to a fire inspectors pay. What is wrong with this picture. They both volunteer. Let the fire fighter enjoy their BBQ.
Thanks


Posted by Roy Desoto, a resident of another community
on Jul 19, 2011 at 6:23 am

Bwlow is a link to an interesting story about the Taj Majals the district is about to build. The old stations no longer accomodate the increased staff and larger trucks. Could this be because of the increased mission? Bloat??

Millions are about to be spent to replace fire stations. The Board has been buying residential parcels adjacent to existing stations to make room for the palaces.

[Portion removed due to promoting a website]


Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jul 19, 2011 at 6:58 am

Read the entire story and I think that you will find Roy's glib characterization to be ill founded:

"four of its aging stations will be upgraded to meet a host of modern safety standards.

"Fire Stations typically have a life expectancy of 40 years and four of the District's seven Fire Stations are over 50 years of age and need to be updated," said Fire Chief Harold Schapelhouman"

Roy - please explain your interests and your qualifications to be making such sweeping judgements.


Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jul 19, 2011 at 9:19 pm

After hearing numerous public comments in support of this policy and also being told by union representatives that the Fire Board is precluded by law from adopting such a policy without first conferring with the unions (a position that the Fire Board's Counsel advised was without legal basis) the Fire Board adopted this policy by a unanimous vote.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 2,536 views

Chai Brisket
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,802 views

Sometimes "I'm Sorry" Doesn't Cut It
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 989 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 912 views

Getting High in Menlo Park
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 634 views