Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jul 17, 2011
What they should consider is the interest of the average citizen. That is, the compensation should be as little as possible commensurate with attracting qualified applicants.
So set a low wage and only bump it up if you can't hire qualified people. No need to look at other fire departments, survey the community, etc.
I anticipate that if the FD offered minimum wage the line would still be out the block.
Joseph E. Davis is correct. State Prison inmates often work on fire crews as part of their sentence. That would make convicted felons "qualified candidates" (by virtue of their training and work experience). They would gladly work for minimum wage. The principles do not define the minimum qualifications.
The principles will drive the agency toward mediocrity, by establishing a bunch of rules which hamstring the agency employees -- specifically around the hiring of new firefighters.
The Board needs to look at itself in the mirror. They need to ask why are they enacting these principles to tighten compensation and entitlements when they take them too. The Board members are entitled to participate in the union's cushy medical plan! The MPFPD foots the bill. And, that's on top of the other perks which include badges, scanner installation, and turnout gear. Giving starts at home.
The real problem is the Fire District, over time, has expanded its mission to use all of the funds they get through property taxes. It's a big slice of the pie. They get over $30 million each year to operate a FD for Atherton, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, and pockets of unincorporated area. They get 17% of the pie and their community governments get roughly 10%.
The more useful set of principles would be ones which define the MPFPD's mission in a way which allows them to use less than the $30 million they receive. Though, given public sentiment, it's more fashionable to bash the firefighters.
There is another thread on this topic: Web Link
I think the min wage comment was non-sequitur. You would not get lines around the block. The point is that hundreds apply for an FD opening, so clearly compensation could be reduced such that you get 5 qualified applicants per opening. It is not a vacuum such that either side can unilaterally set pay rates.
Is this what a "race to the bottom" looks like?
This is neither a race to the top or a race to the bottom, but a move towards a rational compensation policy which reflects the economic realities of the communities which the Fire District serves and which respects the taxpayers who support the Fire District.
They make too much.
The politics regarding the employment of fire fighters is profound.
Perhaps one should look towards THOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY on the Beltramo property where this is a fire fighter run and owned business. This company uses the fire fighting symbol in their signage. Where does this all end. Surely the public is so tired of being screwed by the fire district. They wave the flag, show pictures of their captain,s head through the top of the roof of a house, beat the drums how important and brave they are. A Captain in the Army confronting combat on a daily basis does not come close to the third year fire fighter in compensation and retirment. Scary enough. Try fighter pilots who spend four years in college, a minimum of two years in flight training, and years of continuous training, does not come close to a fire inspectors pay. What is wrong with this picture. They both volunteer. Let the fire fighter enjoy their BBQ.
Bwlow is a link to an interesting story about the Taj Majals the district is about to build. The old stations no longer accomodate the increased staff and larger trucks. Could this be because of the increased mission? Bloat??
Millions are about to be spent to replace fire stations. The Board has been buying residential parcels adjacent to existing stations to make room for the palaces.
[Portion removed due to promoting a website]
Read the entire story and I think that you will find Roy's glib characterization to be ill founded:
"four of its aging stations will be upgraded to meet a host of modern safety standards.
"Fire Stations typically have a life expectancy of 40 years and four of the District's seven Fire Stations are over 50 years of age and need to be updated," said Fire Chief Harold Schapelhouman"
Roy - please explain your interests and your qualifications to be making such sweeping judgements.
After hearing numerous public comments in support of this policy and also being told by union representatives that the Fire Board is precluded by law from adopting such a policy without first conferring with the unions (a position that the Fire Board's Counsel advised was without legal basis) the Fire Board adopted this policy by a unanimous vote.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Freebirds Palo Alto shutters, Pieology to move in
By Elena Kadvany | 11 comments | 3,031 views
A Glimpse into local HS Suicide
By Chandrama Anderson | 5 comments | 2,055 views
Deny the 429 Univ Ave Project Appeal
By Steve Levy | 7 comments | 1,257 views
Now Playing - Your Dinner!
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 896 views
Water War & Peace
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 302 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 The Almanac
All rights reserved.