Town Square

Post a New Topic

Sequoia Healthcare District proposes additional $600,000 P.E. subsidy for Redwood City School District

Original post made by Jack Hickey, Woodside: Emerald Hills, on Apr 2, 2012

This story contains 381 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by Tim Wulff
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2012 at 9:27 am

Thank you, Jack for keeping your eye on the ball and letting folk know about it.

As you know, the Sequoia Healthcare is an illegal non-mandated example of non-representative government at its worst.

Eventually, people will listen to the story of how a hospital district was high-jacked without public approval to become a slush fund for local politicos to play with at will...including employing out-of-work buddies.

Cloaking this in a shroud of holier-than-thou philanthropy does not address the legitimate right of people being taxed to have elected representatives directly responsible for the collection and use of their monies. LAAFCO's provide no such representation. They are entirely appointed thus layering and protecting these very powerful bodies from any culpability to the electorate.

Your State District system at work.

Keep up the good work, Jack.


Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2012 at 11:19 am

Sequoia Healthcare District is here today because of these five people
Art Faro, Katie Kane, Jerry Shefren, Nappy MacNaughton and Michael Smith ignoring the Grand Jury of 2000-01 "The Sequoia Healthcare District should reduce property taxes for district taxpayers unless in a future election district voters approve expenditures for purposes not approved by district voters in the 1946 measure establishing the district…" The board's response was,"The Board does not believe that it would be in the best interests of the District to implement the Grand Jury's recommendations at this time and so declines to do so." If the five above had honored and respected the grand jury's recommendation, the Sequoia Health Care District would not be collecting taxes and redistributing them as they so please.

Here is the Grand Jury Final Report
Web Link


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Nitro cold-brew, early hours: What's new at ZombieRunner in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 7,628 views

Heart Pounding, Hands Cold and Sweating
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,169 views