Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Jul 6, 2012
Still a boondoggle. It will always require substantial subsidies from an already broke state. If Caltrain ridership is marginal, why would this be much different. I don't plan to use it.
Disappointed that Mr. Gordon voted in favor of it given that Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Atherton don't favor it. But I guess he joined his fellow democrats.
Rich Gordon is bought and paid for by the labor unions. that's why he voted for it. That's why all of those that voted for it did so.
This project will never be built - the only question is how much will be wasted on consultants and lobbyists before it dies.
At this point at least $7.9 billion will be pissed away before it dies.
This is a terrible misuse of taxpayer money. There is a huge difference between the need for local area commute service & long-distance transit to major cities, which is what high-speed is supposed to be about.
The construction crews in the central valley will go mainly to undocumented non-citizens.
I will actively campaign against any legislators who supported this. Very disappointing that Gordon & Hill sold out on this. Eshoo has had her last vote from me.
This is senate 3rd reading vote 15 to 27 for HSR, July 5th. Rich Gordon and Jerry Hill in favor.
We can't pay the bills we already have, let alone this ever-ballooning fiasco. There is only one way to make sure the ridiculous waste stops now. Write, call or email Senator Joe Simitian. And be sure NOT to vote for Rich Gordon and Jerry Hill.
GLAD IT PASSED. Hope it passes the Assembly too.
This website isn't representative, hope it passes this last hurdle.
THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS ISSUE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT
AND REFRESHING TO READ THAT AT LEAST SOMEONE IS SPEAKING OUT ABOUT!
(Thank you, Shannon)!
"Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfield, said the legislators "lied to the voters," who approved a $9.95 billion bond for high-speed rail in 2008. At that time, the project's estimated price tag was less than $40 billion. Today, it stands at about $68 billion.
"You lied, and the voters know it," Grove said. "I hope you'll give the voters an opportunity to re-approve this disastrous project when they were lied to in the beginning."
Now, WHAT CAN WE DO TO FORCE THE LIARS TO REMEDY THIS SITUATION? Everyone who has commented here so far are absolutely right! What can we do to fix this? I would think that the lies and all of the deception would be not only unjust, but punishable!!!!! Again, I will ask the same question.....Has anyone else seen the EMPTY trains? They are this way EACH & EVERY DAY!! All the money in the world WILL NOT increase ridership! Come on people, let's face the truth and be done wit this selfish, greedy & 100% political "wolf in sheeps clothing" boondoggle!
WHAT CAN WE DO TO FORCE THE LIARS TO REMEDY THIS SITUATION?
Ummm, start with yer caps lock?
Build it. America needs to get back to advanced infrastructure and leading the way.
Historically, California has always led the way for America.
HSR approved...What a mess.....Web Link
For all of you who favor this project, can we send you the bills when it runs WAY over budget?
No project in this state, in the last 25+ years, has run on time and on budget and not have to be substantially subsidized.
All in a state that has no money.
Just another stab in the back to the youth of California. The burdens that are being foisted on them are outrageous.
Don't see folks whining about the billions pissed away on widening 101.. Almost as expensive per mile to widen as per mile of 68B$ HSR. Hypocrites !
you need to do your homework. the widening of 101 is nowhere near the cost per mile of HSR.
This is just disgusting. I am disappointed but not surprised that Gordon voted in favor. Now, will there be anyone to challenge him? Or, are we too beholden to unions and political hacks in this town?
Sen. Joe Simitian got it right and voted NO.
"One dissenter, Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, said public support had waned for the project, and there were too many questions about financing to complete it.
"Is there additional commitment of federal funds? There is not. Is there additional commitment of private funding? There is not. Is there a dedicated funding source that we can look to in the coming years? There is not," Simitian said."
Wrong Bob. Menlo Park DID approve of HSR.
Right you are, Belle Palm. California set the standard of going broke, yet still trying to spend money they don't have, and mortgaging our grandchildren's future, and the good old USA followed suit. Time for you and Jerry Hill and Rich Gordon and their colleagues to look in the mirror to find the cause of our doomed economy. You 3 stooges seem to be part of the very few people who still think this is a good idea. Good for Shannon Grove and Jioe Simitian for speaking up. I know where my votes will go, and where they will not.
Very well put: Amen!
CA will continue to be in a financial mess until we stop voting for fiscally irresponsible people regardless of their party. But I don't see that happening any time soon.
If you were a family spending more than you have coming in, pretty soon the debt collectors are going to be knocking on your door.
Bottom line -- you should NOT spend more than you make; it always leads to trouble. The HSR decision is as much about finance as it is about transportation.
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 2,364 views
Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,025 views
What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 31 comments | 1,284 views
Death with Dignity
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,161 views
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 431 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2014 The Almanac
All rights reserved.