Town Square

Post a New Topic

Donated stock takes a dive

Original post made on Jul 11, 2012

The town of Portola Valley has begun selling 100,000 shares of stock that were donated to the town to reserve naming rights for the renovated baseball field at Town Center.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, July 11, 2012, 11:40 AM

Comments (9)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Jul 11, 2012 at 12:20 pm

Change financial advisors & tell us who gave you the bum advice so the rest of us can avoid that source.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by cornfused
a resident of another community
on Jul 11, 2012 at 12:27 pm

This article is laughably lacking in the details a reader or taxpayer would want:
"but by the time selling restrictions were lifted, the stock had plunged in value, Councilman Ted Driscoll told the Almanac." what and when were the selling restrictions and when did the value plunge? 4 years is a long time since receipt.

"The town didn't need the cash and was advised to hold the stock" advised by whom?

Any one who has taken the most basic investing class knows the concept of a diversified portfolio, commonly known as "don't put all your eggs in one basket". They basically became gamblers in the market at that point. What could they possibly stand to gain from that approach? Who is responsible for oversight? Did the Town buy any Facebook stock?

Also re: naming rights, if the donor gave $2.3M of stock in exchange for naming rights, then they deserve naming rights. It isn't their fault that the Town gambled away the value subsequent to transfer (unless the value had plunged prior to the first opportunity to sell).


 +   Like this comment
Posted by upset
a resident of Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
on Jul 11, 2012 at 1:04 pm

Wow, very disappointing when our community can benefit. First the PV school finances compromised and now the town finances compromised. Lets pull together to ensure this won't happen again! Lets get 3 opinions from financial planners in the future.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Common Sense
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Jul 11, 2012 at 1:10 pm

The responsibility of the Town is to SELL the stock immediately upon receipt. Forget anyone's opinion on the matter, that is called speculation which has no place in this matter. You accept someone's generous donation and then watch it evaporate because you THOUGHT the stock would go higher??? Unforgivable.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Charlie
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Glens
on Jul 11, 2012 at 1:21 pm

Duh !! Embarrassed, yeah.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by menlores
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Jul 11, 2012 at 3:56 pm

menlores is a registered user.

GREEDY is a more appropriate title for the town.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by A. Person
a resident of Woodside: other
on Jul 11, 2012 at 4:48 pm

Unfortunately this article does a poor job of answering a few basic and relevant questions, like: what was the first date that the stock could have been sold? And did the selling restrictions prohibit the town from purchasing put option protection?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Portola Valley: other
on Jul 12, 2012 at 6:38 am

the donor gifted the stock in good faith - naming rights shouldn't be denied because of poor management of the money


 +   Like this comment
Posted by POGO
a resident of Woodside: other
on Jul 12, 2012 at 6:48 am

"Common sense" is absolutely correct. You would think that Portola Valley's elite, with their proximity to the private equity firms on Sand Hill Road would know that.

When a private portfolio company of a venture firm goes public, they almost always distribute the stock to their limited partners immediately and value the asset at that price. The reason is that they (as PRIVATE equity managers) are no more qualified to manage a PUBLIC company stock than you are (much less, a city like Portola Valley). The newly public company stock may go up or down - and that gain or loss is attributed AFTER the distribution.

The person or entity that "donated" this stock to the city probably won big time because they likely received the fully appreciated value as a tax deduction. Portola Valley, on the other hand, gambled and lost.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 3,502 views

Charter School Proposal Steeped In Unintended Consequences
By Erin Glanville | 48 comments | 2,002 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,988 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,356 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 14 comments | 653 views