|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
A unanimous San Mateo County Board of Supervisors on Dec. 11 introduced a measure to raise the annual salary of the county manager to $300,000. If the board approves the measure in January, the $30,000, 11-percent raise would benefit John Maltbie, the county manager for 20 years prior to his retirement in 2008 and who the board has rehired after 13 months as interim manager.
But while $300,000 is a raise, it is actually a cut in Mr. Maltbie’s pay, for both his interim managerial work (including retirement pay) and when he was in the position permanently.
As interim manager for the year that began in November 2011, Mr. Maltbie made around $325,000 during the 12 months, if you include his retirement pay, according to calculations confirmed by supervisors Don Horsley and Dave Pine. He received $133,000 in retirement money, which he is entitled to draw from the county provided he worked as interim manager fewer than 960 hours per fiscal year. Because he began and is terminating his interim position around the middle of two fiscal years, 2011-12 and 2012-13, he met the 960-hour requirement for both years and earned $192,000 at $100 an hour during the 12 months.
As permanent manager, Mr. Maltbie was paid $270,000 but regularly made around $342,000, Mr. Horsley told the Almanac. How? By exercising a privilege granted to the county manager and the county counsel: they receive nine weeks of vacation per year (another singular privilege) and they can cash in unused vacation and raise their salaries while retaining their jobs.
These privileges are still in effect for both Mr. Maltbie and County Counsel John Beiers, which Mr. Beiers confirmed in an email. If Mr. Maltbie exercises this privilege, he could increase his new salary to $352,000, but the board has suggested, and Mr. Maltbie apparently agrees, that he will not do that. The contract includes the following sentence: “It is the intention of the County Manager and Board of Supervisors that the County Manager fully utilize his annual vacation accrual.”
Attracting ‘top talent’
“His plan and intent is to use that vacation time and that’s the board’s expectation as well,” Mr. Pine said in an interview. “These were the terms that were negotiated to retain him. One of the most important decisions a government board will ever make is (choosing) the chief executive officer. From my perspective, you want to find the best person you can and have confidence in that person’s abilities.”
Mr. Maltbie knows how to get things done, which is no small task in this county, Mr. Pine said, adding that he is comfortable with the overall compensation despite a perception problem in the timing: giving a county official an 11 percent raise right after voters approved a half-cent sales tax in the face of a structural deficit and to help the public health system maintain viability and prepare for some 50,000 more clients in 2014 when the Affordable Care Act takes effect. The raise “is not without its critics,” Mr. Pine said.
“The overall package is well worth his talent,” he said. Asked for an example, Mr. Pine paused a few seconds. “He’s done a great job working with all the stakeholders, working through the realignment process. Not many people can do that, working with the independently elected leaders and building some consensus.”
Had Mr. Maltbie not been interested in the job, a recruiter would likely have done a salary survey and returned with a figure close to $300,000, Mr. Beiers said. The salary has been unchanged for five years, he said, adding that the county did do an “informal” salary survey. It’s probably close to what we would have paid. The benefit with John is that there’s no ramp-up time,” he said. “We want to attract top talent.”
Weeks of vacation
When asked to comment on the vacation cash-in benefit and the nine weeks of vacation, Mr. Beiers responded via email. “The Board adopted a Resolution in a public meeting many years ago that provided the vacation and cash out option to the County Manager and County Counsel. This was approximately a decade ago and I have only been in this position for one and a half years so I am not familiar with the history and context of those negotiations. The County Counsel and County Manager are the only two employees appointed directly by the Board. Other County employees including my direct reports accrue vacation based on number of years of service, as published in the County salary schedule.”
The salary schedule appears to show that the most vacation that the other 5,102 employees in the county can earn is about five weeks a year, but only after 25 years of employment.
Mr. Maltbie and the five supervisors receive another benefit: $1,000 a month for car allowance. The Almanac asked Mr. Pine, who lives in Burlingame, if that’s reasonable. “Yeah, definitely,” he said, and noted that that day he had been to Redwood City, South San Francisco and Palo Alto. “I’m on the road a lot,” he said.
I rest my case,on my comment that Don Horlsey B? Slapped Dave Pine on this Whistleblower and ethics presentation. Nov 20th 2012. In my many years of experience working as a victims advocate it not uncommon to see a victim getting closer to their abuser. The great news for all of us in San Mateo County is that somehow a 11% raise / increase is actually a cut according to Don and Dave. And which they didn’t mention until today.
Starting a little early on the ‘cheer’, are we?
My problem is that $300K is a hell of a lot of money for anyone in this position. There’s a not-so-virtuous cycle that is going on with executive pay, in government, some non-profits, and most companies in which consultants conduct studies of competitor organization salaries, report that your CEO is falling behind those surveyed, so boards bump up compensation to remain “competitive.” No one stops to perform a sanity check to see if such salaries are warranted by the work performed, the income and savings generated, and perhaps most importantly, the equity within the organization’s highest and lowest paid workers.
Would it be the “manager’s” job to know how far to pave Alpine Road for the City of Menlo Park? For all this great managerial money that is being paid you’d figure SOMEONE would have know where to take the paving to so that the county would finish the rest. Stanford seems to have know exactly where to stop their path. Is the City ever going to fix the rest? Perhaps when PG&E gets around to fixing their mess, that contractor could be hired to fix the miscalculation??
Regardless of whether or not this was a raise, it’s too much money. This has nothing to do with the person but the amount of money the BOS approved. It’s no wonder governments are out of money and need to raise taxes.
It is too much money, period. What if he dies? The man retired, and should be working training and assisting the next County Manager, not playing place-holder. The fix is in.
This is a man who has already abruptly resigned and then quickly rescinded his resignation in the past. We never found out what triggered that resignation in the first place.