another controversy at the DA's office
Original post made by studabaker, Menlo Park: Downtown, on Mar 11, 2013
The complainnt is admonished not to share the contents of the letter to anyone, pursuant to an arcane provision of the California B&P Code?
Presumably the privacy rights and ability of a practitioner of the law to continue to earn a living are at stake.
Reputations are important when it comes to professional services.
Then again the conduct of the professional in question is a public official
This will be a huge headache for Wagstaffe.
It could cost him his job
Palo Alto: Pastis owner to open second French restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 2,055 views
Marriage Interview 9: Make a Date to Have Sex Once or Twice a Week and . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 17 comments | 1,575 views