Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Mar 26, 2013
What the article doesn't speak to is the fact that FBs plan includes the removal of 175 out of the 200 heritage trees that are presently on that site. To be replaced with trees in flower pots on the roof. Office in a forest my foot. In a town that prides itself as being so tree friendly that it will (and has) prevent a homeowner from expanding their house because it will take out ONE heritage tree, with enough money thrown their way, the town leaders consider 175 heritage trees to be insignificant(after receiving $$$). I am not an avid environmentalist(tree hugger), but I do really dislike the two things that MP has displayed during this whole FB love affair; hypocrisy and greed.
It would be a violation of the California Constitution (which explicitly prohibits gifts of public property) and a horrible precedent (why not do this for every other proposed development in the city) to give the Marriott Residence Inn Garwood Way (even for five years) the Inn to meet its parking requirements. The city should enter into a a long term, prepaid lease at market rates with Marriott for this property.
The transient occupancy tax was passed by the voters without any provision of offsetting that tax by providing city land at no cost to the hotels impacted by that tax.
I thought senior housing was needed in Menlo Park. Is any provision at all being made for the seniors who are displaced? Do we really need another hotel?
re:Hotel - Do not downgrade the parking requirements. The Downtown Plan requires 174 spaces.
Marriott wants to provide fewer than half that number (74) and get exclusive use of 39 spaces on Garwood? Still far fewer than required, with more than 1/3 of those from public space. Those public spaces will be needed when any El Camino project begins, for the construction workers & probably for employee parking later.
The Glenwood/El Camino/San Antonio/Mills road area is overly congested now during school transit & commute times. I see huge added traffic issues & ingress/egress problems (think left turns) with a hotel in that location.
This appears to be a greedy step from MP to get transit tax revenue at the expense of the rest of the community & local senior housing for the aging locals who can't afford Vee, The Sequoias, or The Forum.
If MP wants a hotel, make the hotel design a plan for its parking needs. Allow only a smaller, maybe fancier, hotel needing fewer spaces? A la Garden Court vs residence inn? Better yet, make the appropriate budget & excess staff cuts so MP doesn't sell out its own plan for parking requirements for transient tax revenue.
Cutting this deal with Marriott is unfair to any other downtown businesses who are expected to comply. Ever hear of the same rules for everyone? It's called "fair play."
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?
- Atherton: Lindenwood
- Atherton: Lloyden Park
- Atherton: other
- Atherton: West Atherton
- Atherton: West of Alameda
- Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
- Menlo Park: Belle Haven
- Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
- Menlo Park: Downtown
- Menlo Park: Fair Oaks
- Menlo Park: Felton Gables
- Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
- Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
- Menlo Park: other
- Menlo Park: Park Forest
- Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
- Menlo Park: South of Seminary/Vintage Oaks
- Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
- Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
- Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle
- Menlo Park: The Willows
- Menlo Park: University Heights
- Portola Valley: Brookside Park
- Portola Valley: Central Portola Valley
- Portola Valley: Ladera
- Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
- Portola Valley: other
- Portola Valley: Portola Valley Ranch
- Portola Valley: Westridge
- Portola Valley: Woodside Highlands
- Woodside: Emerald Hills
- Woodside: Family Farm/Hidden Valley
- Woodside: Kings Mountain/Skyline
- Woodside: Mountain Home Road
- Woodside: other
- Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
- Woodside: Woodside Glens
- Woodside: Woodside Heights
- Woodside: Woodside Hills
- Belle Haven Elementary
- Corte Madera School
- Encinal School
- Hillview Middle School
- James Flood Magnet School
- La Entrada School
- Las Lomitas School
- Laurel School
- Menlo-Atherton High School
- Oak Knoll School
- Ormondale School
- Willow Oaks Elementary
- Woodside High School
- Woodside School
- another community
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Teavana Palo Alto closes
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,480 views
What Freshmen Should be Thinking About College
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 10 comments | 1,882 views
Sometimes the Rules Go Out the Window
By Cheryl Bac | 5 comments | 1,707 views
Waiting on the Edge of Death
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 557 views
Menlo Park Playing Nicely
By Paul Bendix | 0 comments | 151 views
Home & Real Estate
Shop Menlo Park
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
Palo Alto Online
Mountain View Voice
© 2015 The Almanac
All rights reserved.