Town Square

Post a New Topic

Portola Valley man sentenced for tax-evasion

Original post made on Mar 5, 2014

Portola Valley resident Christopher B. Berg was sentenced Feb. 27 to a year and a day in prison after pleading guilty in January 2013 to "willfully failing to file the required report of foreign bank account," according to federal attorneys.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, March 5, 2014, 7:35 AM

Comments (4)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Vlae Kershner
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Mar 5, 2014 at 9:44 pm

How can he be sentenced to STATE prison after a federal prosecution?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by what about the bank
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 5, 2014 at 10:16 pm

How did UBS have no clue that this was dirty money? Why can't the Feds go after them for money laundering?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dave Boyce
Almanac staff writer
on Mar 6, 2014 at 9:41 am

Dave Boyce is a registered user.

Thank you, Vlae Kershner, for pointing out the discrepancy. A state prison term included in a federal sentence is indeed incongruous and an error in the story, now corrected.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kristin
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Mar 8, 2014 at 10:41 am

It wasn't dirty money, it wasn't money laundering, it was legal source income that simply wasn't reported. There's a difference.

What I want to know is how did he get nailed for things that happened past the statute of limitations? It sounds like he had to pay tax/penalties for the 2001-2005 income, but civil liability and criminal prosecution is limited to 6 years from the last offense. That puts the cut off in mid 2012. The only thing I can conclude is that either the DOJ got an extension on the SOL which makes you wonder why have an SOL at all, or they got the indictment in before the 2005 SOL expired and then leveraged the tax on the prior years as part of the plea.

The other thing I don't get is how this guy who didn't report $650k got a year in prison when Ty Warner hid $100 mil and got 2 years probation, Mrs. Curran in FL hid 42mil and got 5 mins of probation. It seems to be an inverse correlation. The more you have and the more you hid, the worse your crime, the lower your punishment. That doesn't seem right to me. It seems the guys hiding tens of millions or more should get a much stronger sentence than the ones hiding a few thousand.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 2,436 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 2,095 views

One night only: ‘Occupy the Farm’ screening in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,996 views

What Are Menlo Park’s Priorities?
By Erin Glanville | 36 comments | 1,395 views

Water Torture
By Paul Bendix | 1 comment | 449 views