Town Square

Post a New Topic

Council majority forgot to negotiate for public

Original post made by HorseTrader, Menlo Park: The Willows, on Oct 24, 2006

Monies paid by the developer to the city, schools, fire district, etc in the forms of “impact fees” and “mitigation” costs are called "exactions". These are nothing more than legally enforceable reimbursements to public service providers for costs they will incur to provide public services to the project. Exactions are not paid until after the project is built.

This story contains 395 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (8)

Like this comment
Posted by 20 questions
a resident of Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Oct 25, 2006 at 1:33 am

Horse Trader: Do you think Proposition 90 will play a role here? After Nov. 7, if Proposition 90 passes, will the city have to pay the property owner $64 million for "downzoning" the property by reversing the zoning ordinances under the threat of a referendum?

Or, if the referendum passes, would that be considered a "downzoning" for which the property owner must be compensated under Prop 90?

How about the adjoining property at 1300 El Camino Real? The general plan and zoning language were changed to allow density on that site equal to the Derry site. Although 1300 technically wasn't rezoned, I understand, because the zoning map was not changed, could the propoerty owner have a claim under Proposition 90, which would require a government agency to compensate a property owner for any action that reduces the market value of a property, unless that act is justified by public health and safety.

Like this comment
Posted by HorseTrader
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Oct 25, 2006 at 9:09 am

The "upzonings" are not yet entitled.

The laws enabling the entitlement were challenged within the legal time limit of 30 days after enactment. If devlopement rights were legally "entitled" then "taking" them could result in a "takings" suit.

1300 is not yet entitled either, as far as I now.

If the referendum passes, (the laws are not enacted) then no vesting takes place. No vesting, no takings.

Prop 90 really deals with another power, "eminent domain." Prop 90 restricts and regulates government use of eminent domain.

Web Link

In general, I cannot say what effect Prop 90 might have on other takings claims that are not related to an eminent domain, but I do know that the Supreme Court has consistently found that government has no obligation to preserve market value. It must preserve "some use" of the property, it cannot effectively zone away *all* uses, but it is not obligated to preserve those uses which would fetch highest market values.

Like this comment
Posted by 20 questions
a resident of Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Oct 25, 2006 at 10:58 am

Horse Trader:
Thanks. You make some good points about the referendum.
Everyone should be clear about this: Prop 90 goes well beyond eminent domain. See Almanac story:
Web Link
Also, Prop 90, as a constitutional amendment, may override Supreme Court decisions about government liability for actions that reduce the market value of property.

Like this comment
Posted by VoteSmart
a resident of Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park
on Oct 25, 2006 at 3:35 pm

Don't be naive -- why would a millionaire East Coast real estate tycoon be pouring his own money into this initiative if all he wanted to do was protect poor, innocent home owners from nasty government thugs trying to take away their homes?

Prop. 90 sells itself by telling people it will protect their homes from eminent domain, but it's really a giant, Hummer-size loophole for preventing any government land use decisions, including decisions that protect the environment, or even decisions that will protect homeowner's property values.

If it were just about eminent domain, Prop. 90 would address real estate. Instead, it protects "private property" a broad term that includes business interests, development rights, you name it.

Like this comment
Posted by HorseTrader
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Oct 26, 2006 at 5:57 pm

20 Questions you are right:

I hadn't paid too much attention to 90 but it apparently extends way beyond limiting the eminent domain power, and may contain provisions to guarantee market value.

You may be seeing a discussion of the impacts of 90 on the Derry referendum in the local papers soon.

Like this comment
Posted by WatchOutForProp90
a resident of Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
on Oct 27, 2006 at 4:17 pm

Those of you not familiar with prop 90 should become familiar with it. Its scope and power extends well beyond trying to regulate cities ability to acquire private land through eminent domain.

Beware and read up on this truly bad idea.

Like this comment
Posted by Tasty Freeze
a resident of Menlo Park: Felton Gables
on Oct 30, 2006 at 9:28 pm

Thanks for the clearing up the difference between public benefits and exactions. I've heard so much from both sides it was hard to make heads of tail of the different claims.

Like this comment
Posted by Frozen Out
a resident of Menlo Park: Stanford Hills
on Nov 6, 2006 at 6:29 pm

I agree that Prop 90 is very bad for cities, and I too recommend a "no" vote on 90.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

“Housewife” a Journey of Transgender Marriage
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 5,394 views

Tava Kitchen shutters in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 11 comments | 2,695 views

Holiday LEGO Show
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 1,416 views