Town Square

Post a New Topic

Letter: Owner not responsible for Park Theatre's condition

Original post made on Feb 5, 2009

Robert Brooks' letter to The Almanac last week blamed the Park Theatre's owner for its run-down condition. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 12:00 AM

Comments (3)

Posted by Sue Kayton, a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Feb 5, 2009 at 9:01 am

The San Francisco Chronicle has an article about a similar problem with a single-screen movie theater in SF. Read their article at

Web Link

S.F.'s Metro theater: Tired preservation tale
C.W. Nevius
Thursday, February 5, 2009
In what is becoming an on-going theme in San Francisco, preservationists are fighting plans by a developer to renovate an antiquated theater. In this case it is the Metro on Union Street, built in 1924. Boarded up and abandoned for two years, the theater is another victim of the poor economics of running a large, single-screen movie theater.
Historical preservation is a nice idea. In a perfect world, cities would set aside funds to save the lovely old buildings from the past. But the reality is that neighborhoods, even trendy ones like Cow Hollow, are struggling and need the shot in the arm a large renovation project like this could provide.
The historians need to wake up and smell the popcorn. When they delay potential projects for years, hoping to save gilded trim on ceiling columns, they are doing a disservice to the very neighborhoods they insist they are trying to help. It happened with the Pagoda in North Beach - vacant since 1994 while groups squabbled - and it is happening on Union Street.
"I'm just sitting here looking at an eyesore," said Peter James, who has run Fog City Leather across the street from the Metro for 20 years. "We've got 15 vacancies on the street already. The neighborhood, I think, would like to have anything in there."
The group advocating to preserve the Metro, the San Francisco Neighborhood Theater Foundation, is comprised of proud San Franciscans who ardently believe in rescuing the glories of the past. The group gets credit for raising the money to buy and save the historic Vogue Theatre and brokering a deal to renovate the Marina Theater on Chestnut (although with a Walgreens as prime tenant). They insist that they are open to any sensible idea for the Metro.
But the features the group wants to "landmark," or legally designate for preservation, would severely limit options for a developer. For example, it wants to preserve the "sloped auditorium floor with fixed seating."
"What in God's name are you going to do with a 10,000-square-foot building with a sloping floor? Skateboarding?" asked District Two supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier, who opposes the landmarking. "I really like these guys, but on this I find myself yelling at them."
Although members of the foundation insist that they are not wedded to the idea of a large, single-screen movie theater, you don't have to talk to them very long before they begin to wax nostalgic about the days they spent in the lush, old movie palaces.
It's a nice thought, says Patrick Corcoran, director of media and research for the National Association of Theatre Owners, but unrealistic.
"A lot of the old movie theaters are quite beloved," he said. "But at some point you have to look at the cold economics. What we are seeing is a higher number of screens and fewer theaters."
Developer Sebastyen Jackovics, who wants to put a high-end gym in the Metro, is frustrated.
"This is like landmarking phone booths when everyone has cell phones," he said.
Unfortunately, variations on this conflict have been a regular feature of San Francisco city planning in the last few years.
The foundation has no legal authority over a private building like the Metro, but the city has a long history of taking preservation advocates into account. Groups like the foundation are often well-connected politically and can tie up projects for years with challenges and complaints.
Besides the Pagoda in North Beach, for which a renovation plan was finally approved in January, there are several empty sites across the city: the Alexandria in the Richmond, the New Mission in the Mission and the Harding in the Western Addition.
"This is ridiculous," said Alioto-Pier. "We cannot continue to have these giant, vacuous open spaces in the middle of neighborhoods."
Developers offered up a plan for the Metro that would preserve the historic murals inside and also retrofit the interior, which is seismically unsafe. They also had a version that would have included a 200-seat theater. Meanwhile, the foundation has suggested a rough idea that would have some 300 seats.
So there's room for compromise? Not on your life.
"I don't want to be a warrior or a fighter," said Katherine Petrin, an architectural historian who wrote the landmark report for the Metro. "But if we capitulate, it is going to be gone, done. I'm not going to do it."
I've known some of the members of the foundation for more than 20 years. They are decent, civic-minded people. I would hate to describe them as obstructionists.
But right now, that's how they look.
The hearing for landmarking will take place Feb. 26 before the city's Planning Commission.


Posted by buh bye Park, a resident of Menlo Park: Belle Haven
on Feb 5, 2009 at 10:56 am

I bet the council would be happy to approve any reasonable use of that space. What they won't approve is a $1mm handout to the owner. Maybe you haven't noticed, but the current council is trying to fix up El Camino -- something that the prior council was apparently too busy to do.

It's the owner that's insisting that the building is historic; the rest of us can see that it's a dump with no architectural merit. The owner needs to demo it and get that eyesore off El Camino! Can't blame the current council for his inertia.

Repeating propaganda doesn't make it true. Isn't it time to stop shilling for Lee?


Posted by Thanks Kelly, a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Feb 5, 2009 at 12:26 pm

I think Kelly Ferguson's support of having the city own part of the expenses, and having it transformed into a dance studio, was great! The idea of saddling the city with MORE expenses, seems to be a great idea to the Fantastic 4! Keep it up Fantastic 4, It's been 2+ years since the "prior council" was on board, and this council has yet to add ANY project, idea or program that actually results in INCREASED revenue for the city, or actually cuts some of the expenses! I challenge anyone out there to give me ONE viable example. Tesla - $0, Derry Project - $0, Envisioning - $0, Commercial Business District - going backward, Mattison - $0............and keeps going, and going, and going.......


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Touring the Southern California “Ivies:” Pomona and Cal Tech
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 5 comments | 2,537 views

Chai Brisket
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 1,802 views

Sometimes "I'm Sorry" Doesn't Cut It
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 989 views

Couples: Parallel Play or Interactive Play?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 913 views

Getting High in Menlo Park
By Paul Bendix | 3 comments | 636 views