Town Square

Post a New Topic

Guest opinion: A Palo Alto take on high speed rail

Original post made on Feb 10, 2009

Last November voters passed Proposition 1A and swept in a new transportation vision for California — one that will see a high-speed rail line as the spine that will connect the key cities and regions of our state.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 12:00 AM

Comments (1)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Martin Engel
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Feb 10, 2009 at 2:58 pm

First of all, Councilwoman Kishimoto is to be commended for her very thoughtful Guest Opinion piece. Furthermore, she is to be congratulated for assuming responsibility for bringing various towns on the Peninsula together into an ad hoc coalition. That process is currently under way and it promises to have us all speak with one voice to the rail authority about many of the issues that Ms. Kishimoto raises in her article. I hope that this process gets formalized and that documents are issued with the signatures of representatives from as many cities as possible along the rail corridor.

We are well past the point of debating the merits of the proposed rail system for California. The Palo Alto city council expressed its unanimous support prior to last November's elections, while Menlo Park issued a statement of opposition. I share the position of Menlo Park and support Menlo Park's participation in the CEQA lawsuit against the high-speed rail authority.

So, this is where we are. The lawsuit will be brought before the court in May. We need to win it. It gives Atherton and Menlo Park leverage.
Whether we win or lose, however, we must also make plans to protect our cities, especially Atherton, Menlo Park and Palo Alto, from the devastating impact of elevated train corridors with four tracks.

One alternative, already seriously considered by our three cities, is tunneling beneath the current rail corridor. That warrants a great deal of analysis and is a promising option inasmuch as it eliminates all the disruptive consequences that an elevated train would produce. No eminent domain adverse takings. No temporary shoofly tracks for
Caltrain. No business disruptions downtown. No property value depreciation. To the contrary! The air rights could well be deployed for limited development and revenue production.

Therefore, in order to make our collective voices heard, the multi-city coalition will be a powerful vehicle that can negotiate successfully to secure the needs for each of our cities regarding the development of the rail corridor.

Thanks to the Council members of Atherton, Menlo Park and Palo Alto for taking the initiative on this important issue.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Sneak peek: Bradley's Fine Diner in Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,436 views

Marriage Underachievers
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,690 views

Best High Dives to Watch the Game
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,343 views

Measure M-- I am not drinking Greenheartís expensive potion
By Martin Lamarque | 41 comments | 1,059 views