Guest opinion: League of Women Voters says 'no' on key propositions Other Topics, posted by Editor, The Almanac Online, on May 6, 2009 at 9:14 pm
The League of Women Voters does not concur with The Almanac's recommendations on the May 19 ballot measures, although we agree that the choices are terrible.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 12:00 AM
Posted by Jack Hickey, a resident of the Woodside: Emerald Hills neighborhood, on May 6, 2009 at 9:14 pm
This should be under "Political" topic.
The League of Women Voters got it right on this one. Vote NO on 1a, 1c, 1d, 1e, and I would personally add a NO on 1b. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association PAC, which has endorsed my candidacy for SM County Supervisor, sees it that way too. Sorry Almanac, you have to go back to school on this one.
Posted by Reject tyranny of the minority, a resident of the Menlo Park: Allied Arts/Stanford Park neighborhood, on May 7, 2009 at 5:34 pm
The LWV is right, we need real reform, not more of the same crazy "fixes" that we've come to expect from Sacramento. How do we go about getting the ridiculous 2/3rds vote to approve the state budget overturned?