Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN ATHERTON   FICTION
  MENLO PARK   MOVIES   OTHER TOPICS   PORTOLA VALLEY
  SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   THE LOCAL DISH   WOODSIDE
  REPORTERS' BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Atherton puts parcel tax on fall ballot
Atherton, posted by Editor, The Almanac Online, on Jul 16, 2009 at 10:53 pm

Atherton voters will be asked to approve a four-year renewal of the $750 annual parcel tax when they head to the polls on Nov. 3. The Atherton City Council voted unanimously at its July 15 meeting to put the parcel tax on the ballot.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, July 16, 2009, 11:21 AM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by sara palin, a resident of another community, on Jul 16, 2009 at 10:53 pm

If you ask me those folks in Atherton are trying to put lipstick on a pig


Posted by Just vote NO, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, on Jul 17, 2009 at 4:01 pm

It is time for the residents to stand up and let the town know they are sick and tired of paying for corruption. Scaring people that "there will not be emergency services so you better pay up" is wrong. It is time to send a strong message to those who abuse moneys and are fiscally irresponsible! NO ON PARCEL TAX!


Posted by jerome, a resident of the Atherton: other neighborhood, on Jul 17, 2009 at 10:43 pm

The town is having to spend a small fortune on attorneys because of a couple of former town employees who forgot their place.

I for one consider $500,000 per year on lawyers a small price to pay.

I know I may be in the minority. But I think it is high time we stand firm. If we have to spend $1 million to avoid paying out 1/2 that amount I think it is a good investment.

So what if the lawers make $300 per hour. They are worth evey penny.


Posted by bill avery, a resident of another community, on Jul 17, 2009 at 11:01 pm

When Jim Robinson was city manager, the parcel tax passed by over 80%

and that was without the help of a PR firm.

What is wrong with this picture?


Posted by $500,000, a resident of the Atherton: West Atherton neighborhood, on Jul 18, 2009 at 1:19 pm

Every time the Town of Atherton has set a budget for legal fees, it has been vastly exceeded. They just added $120,000 to cover through the end of the year. The requested $500,000 for next year will no doubt be increased mid-year. I estimate to nearly $1M.

Of course, if Atherton's lawsuits were just limited to those with former employees, the bill would be less. They've gotten entangled in lawsuits with residents over moving urns, inspections errors on Atherton's part that have prevented people from moving into their own homes, and police misconduct issues.

Again, it's not "their" money. It's "our" money. I think Mr. Gruber should either resign or be fired. When he took the job, there was already an acute awareness that Atherton's legal issues were spiraling out of control. Since he's come on board, the issues have gotten much, much worse. It can really be plotted as a simple function of legal bills.

One might thing the Town Council should be blamed (and they should), but it's been pointed out time and time again that their only function is to hire and fire the town manager, and all other issues flow through him or her.


Sorry. This topic has been locked and no further comments can be posted.
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.