Town Square

Post a New Topic

Charter school sues high school district

Original post made on Jul 25, 2009

The Summit Institute, on behalf of Everest (charter) Public High School, filed a lawsuit against the Sequoia Union High School District on Friday (July 24) in San Mateo County Superior Court.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, July 24, 2009, 4:16 PM

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by Concerned Parent
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Jul 25, 2009 at 12:48 pm

While this is not surprising, it is very understandable. At a time when budgets are being cut all over the place, the SUHSD's bad faith offer will be under a fair amount of scrutiny. Much as I hate to say it from a district budgetary perspective, the district, Pat Gemma, and Board of Trustees deserve to fully lose this. They have demonstrated dispicable behavior ranging from misrepresentation of facts to outright lying in an attempt to avoid any semblance of cooperation with the group from Everest or compliance with the law, all the while complaining about how charter law is unfair. As best as I can tell, this is the only way to assure accountability and while Mr. Gemma does his best to blame Summit/Everest, he needs to look in the mirror. I would look for the usual district moves to follow, lots of griping in the press and attempts to paint Summit/Everest as elitist and taking resources from other students. The one bit of good news from this story is, independent of the whole facility debate, it would be nice for the district to slapped on the wrist for playing different groups within the district against each other. I believe all parents want the best education for their children as well as some freedom to give input as to what that is.

Like this comment
Posted by Anonymous
a resident of Woodside School
on Jul 27, 2009 at 9:28 am

Wow! Perfectly said!

Like this comment
Posted by Interested Reader
a resident of Menlo Park: Stanford Weekend Acres
on Jul 27, 2009 at 12:24 pm

Long on bile. Short on facts. What's really going on?

Like this comment
Posted by another rwc parent
a resident of another community
on Jul 27, 2009 at 5:05 pm

Why is it so difficult for SUHSD to realize they just can't compete with Summit/Everest? Give it up, it's game over, and YOU LOSE. You've had plenty of opportunities to get your act together and create a positive educational experience, but you fail, and fail again. Step aside, you are done, you just don't realize it yet.

Like this comment
Posted by Concerned Parent
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Jul 27, 2009 at 5:13 pm

Interested Reader:
I'd recommend you look through the Almanac issues over the past year for more history but I'd summarize it as follows:

Summit is a charter school located within SUHSD. It has been around about 5 years and appears to be doing a decent job of educating high school children and as word got out, demand as measured by number of applicants, increased. The school model limits a graduating class to a size of around 100, so Everest was proposed as a new charter school to allow more students to attend a school of that type.
SUHSD denied Everest's charter saying there was no need for another charter school. The San Mateo County Board of Education also rejected Everest's charter. Everest appealed to the State Board of Education which unanimously approved the charter. Under Prop 39, the SUHSD is required to provide reasonably equivalent facilities for charter schools. Apparently the Everest leaders requested space on the Sequoia campus, but the district instead offered a not-yet-built campus on Green Street in East Palo Alto.
The crux of the matter, as best as I can tell, is an argument over what consitutes a Prop 39 compliant site. From what I have read, heard, and observed, and as a parent of multiple children within the district, I think the SUHSD has acted in bad faith at every opportunity, hence my comment that they deserve to lose this suit. On the other hand, it pains me in this financial environment, to see any school dollars lost, hence my frustration with and criticism of the SUHSD.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The Saddle Room A True Friend of Kids
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 2,124 views

Palo Alto: Pastis owner to open second French restaurant
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 1,389 views

The Four E's--Pope Francis and the Middle Class
By Steve Levy | 3 comments | 1,000 views

My College Mindset is Intrinsically Motivated
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 906 views

Marriage Interview 9: Make a Date to Have Sex Once or Twice a Week and . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 8 comments | 848 views