Town Square

Post a New Topic

Almanac editorial: Vote yes on Atherton parcel tax

Original post made by News Guy, another community, on Oct 24, 2009

(This editorial was published in the Oct. 21, 2009, issue of The Almanac.)

Every four years Atherton voters must renew the city's parcel tax if they want to keep their government running the way it does today.

As one of the few Peninsula cities with virtually no sales tax revenue, Atherton depends on the tax for nearly $2 million a year in revenue, which, unlike property tax, does not have to be shared with the state. The relatively modest parcel tax, which must be approved by a two-thirds of the voters for passage, is also deductible, which should not go unnoticed in Atherton.

The tax helps pay the costs of various services in the city, from police to road repair and drainage projects. Without it, Mayor Jerry Carlson said, it would be very difficult for the government to function. There is no organized opposition to the parcel tax measures and no one bothered to write a ballot argument against them.

We urge a yes vote on Measure S, to renew the tax, and Measure T, which authorizes the town to collect and spend it.

Comments (3)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Fiscally responsible
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Oct 24, 2009 at 1:14 am

I wholeheartedly agree with the first sentence:

"Atherton voters must renew the city's parcel tax if they want to keep their government running the way it does today."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Thelma
a resident of Atherton: other
on Jun 10, 2011 at 5:47 pm

got that from 09?
you want to pay an even bigger parcel tax for more of this insanity folks?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Jun 10, 2011 at 7:59 pm

We need to quit living in a dream world. The Council kicked the can down the road by setting garbage rates below the true cost under citizen pressure. If the Council now kicks the ever growing personnel costs down the road we will soon have a $3 million/year structural deficit. That would mean a parcel tax of $1,200 just to balance the budget.

There is no Santa Clause and Atherton cannot print money.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,870 views

Don't fund the rape culture at my alma mater
By Jessica T | 36 comments | 2,396 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,960 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 18 comments | 1,485 views

“I live near Sunset”
By Stuart Soffer | 5 comments | 735 views