Sign up for Express
New from the Almanac, Express is an e-edition delivered via email each weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Menlo Park, California Forecast
TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   ATHERTON   FICTION
  MENLO PARK   MOVIES   OTHER TOPICS   PORTOLA VALLEY
  SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS   THE LOCAL DISH   WOODSIDE
  REPORTERS' BLOG

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
What do you think should be done about the Park Theatre?
Menlo Park, posted by Richard Hine, managing editor of The Almanac, on Jan 21, 2007 at 9:50 am
Richard Hine is a member (registered user) of Almanac Online

What do you think should be done about the Park Theatre. Click here for the latest news: Web Link

To post your comment, click on the "Add a comment" link below.


Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by justdontunderstand, a resident of the Menlo Park: Downtown neighborhood, on Jan 21, 2007 at 10:55 am

The shoddy appearance that this abandoned theatre presents there days is dreadful.

The City should pass an ordinance requiring the owner to keep a building like this in descent repair so that it outwardly at least is not a blight to the surrounding structures. It was suggested that perhaps a vacancy tax should be levied on owners of abandoned structures like these to get them motivated into re-building or re-leasing. A good idea.

In any case, this is not a building worthy of any historic interest, in spite of what some council members may think. It should be torn down eventually and replaced by something useful as part of a grander El Camino corridor study.

Why the city council wants to waste their time studying this structure is beyond me.


Posted by TryThisOnForSize, a resident of the Menlo Park: Downtown neighborhood, on Jan 21, 2007 at 7:40 pm

Perhaps the building should be left to stand as an ode to greedy capitalism, as Howard Crittenden kicked out a perfectly good, rent-paying tenant, immediately cut down its distinctive sign (and probably destroyed it afterwards) and left it to rot in the hopes that he could make a killing like all the other developers were doing during the previous council's reign with an office conversion. Instead, it merely ended up serving as a mighty appropriate symbol on an election “hit piece” that helped to oust the former majority. How wonderfully ironic.


Sorry. This topic has been locked and no further comments can be posted.
 

AlmanacNews.com   ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.